Live data from Hacker News

I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

citizendot.github.io

31–40 of 135 posts

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#31
post #8

Bruh the harry potter theme song scared the shit out of me as it turned itself on. Bad UX for a personal site. Great article btw !

sorry, i added it to set the mood for my site :') yk, like moving lamps at the top, hanging dementor at the right side (only visible on desktops). should i remove it?

I used developer tools to delete the dementor, then I muted the site when it started playing music.

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

sorry, i added it to set the mood for my site :') yk, like moving lamps at the top, hanging dementor at the right side (only visible on desktops). should i remove it?

> should i remove it? there is no place for fun, whimsy, moods, or personalization on the web. sorry. (no, at least not at the request of random internet stranger #10545346)

Around here, many people have their sense of humor, removed, during their first colonoscopy.

I joke, anyway, and bear the downvotes. Totally worth it.

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#33

If LinkedIn actually cared about preventing scams, they could implement verification using company emails if you want to list your current employment. And if it is too much of a heavy burden, then at the minimum you should have it as an optional feature that recruiters would have to comply with, if they want to be legitimate.

> they could implement verification using company emails they added this back in 2023 ( https://news.linkedin.com/2023/april/linkedin-s-new-verifica... ), but very less people actually bother to verify with their email, so not having it doesn't always mean it's illegitimate.

The legitimate recruiters should start using it then.

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#34
post #28

> Side note: Why use a raw IP address? If anything, this screams “malware.” At least register a decoy domain like lint-checker.com or jenkins-ci-runner.net. If the threat actors who wrote this are reading: take notes people! Maybe they don't want to give any identifying info to the domain registrar? Or just minimizing their online presence?

fair point

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#37
post #8

Bruh the harry potter theme song scared the shit out of me as it turned itself on. Bad UX for a personal site. Great article btw !

sorry, i added it to set the mood for my site :') yk, like moving lamps at the top, hanging dementor at the right side (only visible on desktops). should i remove it?

Nah, keep it. It's your site and that's where you get to have fun!

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#38
post #28

> Side note: Why use a raw IP address? If anything, this screams “malware.” At least register a decoy domain like lint-checker.com or jenkins-ci-runner.net. If the threat actors who wrote this are reading: take notes people! Maybe they don't want to give any identifying info to the domain registrar? Or just minimizing their online presence?

That's probably the reason bare IP addresses are associated with sketchy stuff.

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#39
> Why use a raw IP address? If anything, this screams “malware.”

If the victim is deep enough to check hook's content, it's unlikely they will just stop here losing suspicion. I'm sure most devs wouldn't think that doing `git commit` can be malicious (git security oversight?).

Re: I Inspected My Take-Home Interview Project. It Was a Whole Operation

#40

always a good day when we get an a post on front actually related to hacking on hackernews.

Except hackernews is about different kind of hackers.

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/H/hacker.html

> 1. A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and how to stretch their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who prefer to learn only the minimum necessary. RFC1392, the Internet Users' Glossary, usefully amplifies this as: A person who delights in having an intimate understanding of the internal workings of a system, computers and computer networks in particular.

> 2. One who programs enthusiastically (even obsessively) or who enjoys programming rather than just theorizing about programming.

Post reply on HN