Why is everyone preparing for war so hard
I hope its less because of war and more because its better to not be so dependent on other countries, similar to how Europe is trying to rely less on the US for digital infrastructure. I also feel like the boomers offshoring everything to China in the 70's is one of the reasons things are worse off nowadays, but I digress.
Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
61–70 of 109 posts
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#62Why is everyone preparing for war so hard
A lot of the answe are reddit-esque throwaway answers and political shill bots, but for a more nuanced answer. For a long timeant people were brought up on the "End of History" idea. That after the Cold war mankind would all get together and sign kimbaya, that war as we knew it was over, sure there would be atrocities and "policing actions" that would be needed to stop some bad guys but everything was good wars of th…
Also, technological changes in our times are slow compared to the end of 19th century. Nukes are 60 year old tech and cheap drones are not particularly sci-fi tech machines.
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#63Why is everyone preparing for war so hard
> Why is everyone preparing for war so hard Unfortunately I think the actual reason is because they know (despite what they say in public) that climate change is a real and present danger, and the resource and migration wars are coming. If you look at everything that seems strange through this lens (see for example: Trump talking about how the US needs to take Canada and Greenland) it looks a lot less strange. There'…
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#64Why is everyone preparing for war so hard
Because China has stated they will take Taiwan, they have been threatening Philippines sovereignty too. Japan and others are on edge too. China currently has been behaving very adversarial and has a huge fraction of the minerals under their control that this article is posting about. I think sovereignty is a good thing. Plan for the worst, hope for the best.
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#65Start by banning disposable vapes. The sheer waste of lithium from those fucking devices is insane in 2026. We need every scrap of it we can get!
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A war with large geographic scope has been independently modeled as having a high probability of occurring circa 2030 by major governments for a decade or more Do you have more information about this, or a source?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/russia-nato-arms-germany-wa... > Germany's defence minister is frank and plain-spoken, but also deliberate with his words and intention. When he talks about Russia, the future of the West and the possibility of another European war, the message however becomes stark: "Our experts say it can happen in 2029." > In remarks published Wednesday, Generalleutnant Christian Freuding, the insp…
Russia can't even take the country next door. How exactly are they going to attack NATO? With a bunch of rusty nukes that almost certainly no longer work, and that would get their (relatively few) major population centers vaporized by nukes that almost certainly work just fine?
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
The point made by the parent comment should not be taken to mean that the Trump administration strategically accomplished the aforementioned goals, just that they were, in a vacuum, accomplished. If you're saying that it seems to you that the tactical goal was accomplished at the expense of the broader historical strategy, I would respond that yes, it does seem that way.
I'm also personally a little skeptical that the current administration would actually go to war with China over, say, Taiwan or control of the South Sea or so on. Maybe they are keeping that in mind, maybe they're just isolationist in general? Whether the admin would have done anything to Iran without being asked by Israel is a big open question for me here.
Testosterone injections won't help there.
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why is everyone preparing for war so hard Unfortunately I think the actual reason is because they know (despite what they say in public) that climate change is a real and present danger, and the resource and migration wars are coming. If you look at everything that seems strange through this lens (see for example: Trump talking about how the US needs to take Canada and Greenland) it looks a lot less strange. There'…
Humans have had major wars throughout history, it's unrealistic to really think that will change. It's in our nature.
Sure, but now all the major powers have society ending devices to deploy when they go to war.
And when you combine that with the fact that the US is currently actively proving it can't impose its will on even Iran despite having a much stronger conventional military, when the next war breaks out between major nuclear powers it is likely to accelerate to the worst possible outcome very quickly.
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#69Why is everyone preparing for war so hard
Re: Critical Minerals: Reducing U.S. import reliance with substitution and recycling
#70Start by banning disposable vapes. The sheer waste of lithium from those fucking devices is insane in 2026. We need every scrap of it we can get!
Its market value is clearly not high enough or they wouldn't use it in disposable vapes.