“We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
131–140 of 742 posts
Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not? Ford distilled Chinese EVs. https://www.businessinsider.com/ford-ceo-taking-apart-tesla-...
and the Chinese distilled western cars for years and years before that and weren't shy about it.
The stupidest part of this is that Anthropic don't even provide the real reasoning traces in their model output. It would be like Ford buying a Chinese EV to tear down, then realizing that the seller had removed the battery and charging system before shipping it to them.
Does anyone believe for a second that Anthropic isn't sending requests to all the Chinese models and analyzing the crap out of them to assess how capable they are, what their reasoning looks like etc?! I guess they'd call that "using" the model, since that sounds nicer.
Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#133I can understand that the AI labs might care about other labs distilling their models as it can eat into their competitive advantage, but do consumers care at all? Aren't consumers benefiting from this practice by getting better cheaper models as a result?
Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#134How does one distill? Just send a million request asking for information? Start with the letter A?
Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#135So what is the issue here? Distilling is still fair, on the same level like Anthropic scraped copyright protected material for their training. So here robbers are blaming robbers? These claims are just pointless, everytime
"You are trying to kidnap what I have rightfully stolen!"
Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#136Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#137So what is the issue here? Distilling is still fair, on the same level like Anthropic scraped copyright protected material for their training. So here robbers are blaming robbers? These claims are just pointless, everytime
> on the same level like Anthropic scraped copyright protected material for their training. I see no problem with distillation, on the other hand the complete dismissal of copyright by AI labs is pretty bad, I don’t think we should put them at the same level
Courts keep ruling over and over that an LLM trained on copyrighted works qualifies as a transformative work and is therefore fair use. They don't have to dismiss copyright law, this has always been allowed.
The only thing they get in trouble for is pirating the works to get their hands on them.
Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#138Re: “We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for the development of K3”
#139Does this matter? Distillation is not illegal by every definition of the word. There are millions of samples available on huggingface and models explicitely trained on output produced by fable. There has been no action taken against them. Another example is that it appears that the upper limit of what you can do is ultimately dependent on people working on the model, otherwise grok would be a LOT more competitive pre…