Live data from Hacker News

When is NVLink worth it?

platform-fools.com

1–10 of 10 posts

Re: When is NVLink worth it?

#5

I badly miss the days when I could buy a GPU and then three years later buy the same GPU for a hundred bucks and boost my framerate by 70%.

Wasn't that actually a very short lived period of time? Especially with gains up to 70%, and you had to contend with new stutters?

Re: When is NVLink worth it?

#7

I badly miss the days when I could buy a GPU and then three years later buy the same GPU for a hundred bucks and boost my framerate by 70%.

Wasn't that actually a very short lived period of time? Especially with gains up to 70%, and you had to contend with new stutters?

nvidia supported it for 17 years and amd still supports it but only on older cards

Re: When is NVLink worth it?

#8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wasn't that actually a very short lived period of time? Especially with gains up to 70%, and you had to contend with new stutters?

nvidia supported it for 17 years and amd still supports it but only on older cards

Oh NV Surround, how we miss thee

Re: When is NVLink worth it?

#9

I badly miss the days when I could buy a GPU and then three years later buy the same GPU for a hundred bucks and boost my framerate by 70%.

I don't miss it.

I got a pair of 9800GTs back in '08 to play with SLI. It only helped with some games, and despite having all those video output jacks the rig only supported two monitors.

By 2015, the essentially-free iGPU part of an i3 Skylake CPU was ~better than the SLI rig.

Re: When is NVLink worth it?

#10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wasn't that actually a very short lived period of time? Especially with gains up to 70%, and you had to contend with new stutters?

nvidia supported it for 17 years and amd still supports it but only on older cards

"Supported" it sure, but I'm dubious of the "70%" increase. It was very dependent on the game being played, and the CPU being used.