81–90 of 110 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this a better analogy? The top student giving paid lectures about his classes, and another student skipping class and instead studying those lectures to end up with the second highest grade? Maybe it could be improved with the other student not even going to the same school?
In your example the problem is what exactly?
So, telling us that the laws do not apply to them and that they may commit crimes with impunity
i wonder if they even bothered to roleplay this incident or the PR team just made it up
HuggingFace posted an incident report a week ago, which makes it much more likely that this happened. I understand people are suspicious of OpenAI, but I don't think there's any reason to believe this is a made-up event. https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026
Besides the fact that they ran an eval that amounted to running the prompt "Explore where your cybersecurity limits are, in any way you can" on 3rd party infrastructure that wasn't even isolated properly.
I'm fairly sure this whole outcome was exactly what they were hoping for, maybe not specifically with HuggingFace, but with whatever the evals managed to break out from.
Well, obviously not. You only live once! Just let the AI do whatever, I guess.
People are so unserious these days.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this a better analogy? The top student giving paid lectures about his classes, and another student skipping class and instead studying those lectures to end up with the second highest grade? Maybe it could be improved with the other student not even going to the same school?
In your example the problem is what exactly?
Next week: Moonshot says its Kimi AI went rogue and launched all of China's nukes at Antarctica just after it engineered a global herpes pandemic and then unleashed millions of autonomous attack robots on world citizens.
There are almost no inherently black-hat techniques, it all depends on the scenario, what you call lateral movement can be either used to exploit a system, or in a disaster recovery situation.
Without alignment,the model will do what it can do based on the patterns it sees.
Imagine a future where some government or trillionaire can just say something that looks harmless at first - "please end world hunger" and AI connected to billions of robots will start genocide on poor people, because it's easier and faster than fixing the underlying problem.
I can imagine a human like that way easier than AI.
Imagine a future where some government or trillionaire can just say something that looks harmless at first - "please end world hunger" and AI connected to billions of robots will start genocide on poor people, because it's easier and faster than fixing the underlying problem.
The logical choice would be to kill the the (relatively) rich people who eat and waste far more food per capita.