Live data from Hacker News

Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

codeberg.org

41–50 of 298 posts

Re: Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

#41
I'm all for banning vibe-coded projects because they are pure turds but I'm not for banning a codebase where AI is used to make the codebase better.

So what's the definition of a vibe-coded project?

I verify the code the latest SOTA/frontier models I pay for do generate and although I daily facepalm myself several times per day, it's still a tool allowing me to be more productive. That's why I've got countless examples of mediocre output to give: if people were to take a look, they'd notice the same.

The problem is the mindset "it runs, hence it's good" of fully vibe-coded crap.

I'm talking about stuff like "Add this information on the webpage next to that other info" and the model going on a tangent and pulling in new libraries to then do a computation on the server-side and then using client/server communication to send the info to then display it.

It works. It did what I prompted. We've got intelligent machines in 2026. Yay!

Except all that nonsense was totally unnecessary and the information was already on the client and all that was needed was to display it.

But the model saw a pattern: can you believe that? A pattern of information being exchanged between the client and the server. So of freaking course my prompt had to be solved by following the same pattern.

So what's that about? Full AI ban or ban of fully AI-generated turds? I'm all for the later but don't ban everything: AI can produce acceptable stuff at a rate that's making it a productivity enhancement tool.

Models have also only been getting better and better: as of 2026 fully vibe-coded projects are pure turds but what about 2028? 2030?

It's not because these things are introducing bugs in every five line of Bash code they write and generate what looks like an infinite amount of slop to solve things which should have required 1/10th of code that it's always going to be like that.

Re: Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

#42

What is a vibe coded project? Where does it start? Cursor autocomplete? One shot Github project copies? [Edit] The pull link is https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253/files and says "7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude , OpenAI Codex ). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (…

If you have to ask then the answer is no.

Re: Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

#43

They are a non-profit with a mission to support free software: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/en/bylaws.... However, they do this because of copyright status and harmful code: "7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude , OpenAI Codex ). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 an…

So 'mostly' is the clearest they get here. Meaning more than 50% of lines of code? At any given time?

Re: Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

#44
post #4

Well, that's their prerogative, I guess. But the burden of proof will be on them, of course. They can't expect users to prove a negative. There are simple tells that would reveal a lot of projects. Claude Code's moronic defaults of littering commit messages with both a CC author trailer as well as a session link will reveal some, but those are easy to disable. Then there is stuff like prolific comments, em-dashes in…

There is no burden of proof for them as they have no obligation to provide a service to anyone.

Re: Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

#45
post #39

What is a vibe coded project? Where does it start? Cursor autocomplete? One shot Github project copies? [Edit] The pull link is https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253/files and says "7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude , OpenAI Codex ). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (…

“You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude , OpenAI Codex ).” Seems pretty clear to me?

If 'mostly' means over 50% you could call this clear.

Otherwise I don't think this is clear at all.

Otherwise, what is mostly?

Mostly at the outset, or at any given time? Must the project move out when it goes from 49% to 51% AI-assisted code?

Re: Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

#47
post #39

What is a vibe coded project? Where does it start? Cursor autocomplete? One shot Github project copies? [Edit] The pull link is https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253/files and says "7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude , OpenAI Codex ). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (…

“You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude , OpenAI Codex ).” Seems pretty clear to me?

What is mostly? >50%? >75%?

What does "written by generative AI" means? Autocomplete? IDE-with-AI-normal-classname-completion? Everything not typed by a human.

I personally don't find this clear at all and see many unhappy discussions in the future for Codeberg.

Re: Codeberg bans vibe coded projects

#50
post #35

This appears to be mostly due to fringe / activist views about copyright, rather than anything to do with quality or principle. If it was the latter I could get on board, as in instituting some standards against slop. But in reality it’s just letting activists hijack with their agenda.

Fringe / activist views about copyright pretty much describes open source / free software so why do you think that is an argument against doing this?
Post reply on HN