21–30 of 141 posts
And... Cue 1M dummies here running that code without even looking at it, SMH.
lot of vitriol in the comments. looks like a spectacularly put together BBS, to me. the tools are open-source and have some really fun looking value add, but no, i haven't ran them.
Design is illegible. Needs more contrast between text and background. I'm not even vision impaired and I was squinting immediately.
I'm, by contrast, an able bodied person with functioning eyes and had no issues.
But, can you reason more about your intent with the tone of your comment?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
there are many many themes. some high contrast ones
Hmm maybe the tool has but the design of the website made me squint as well.
Design is illegible. Needs more contrast between text and background. I'm not even vision impaired and I was squinting immediately.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Your site copy is great to the last drop. It is? It’s just the usual LLM.
The design = “flavor of the week LLM”, but someone still has to proof and tweak generated copy. Someone cared about this page.
We do G, not H. C, D, E — plus an optional F.
No I, no J, no K — just an L into a W.
I would say the design is the most human thing about this page. (It has its charm somehow, even if it’s obviously “flavour of the week LLM design”. Also, I don’t think an LLM would choose colours so poorly unless nudged in that direction – accidentally, I suppose.)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The design = “flavor of the week LLM”, but someone still has to proof and tweak generated copy. Someone cared about this page.
Yeah, no. Not enough to make the page not look and sound like straight from an LLM.