Live data from Hacker News

LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

krebsonsecurity.com

61–70 of 549 posts

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hope you don't have any open WiFi networks nearby. IMO it's better to put it on one of your networks and isolate it from the internet and other devices.

If it connects to another network, it's somebody else's problem. Unless of course, it has a built in webcam or microphone.

It does, at least for any media played through the device. Read up on automatic content recognition.

https://www.howtogeek.com/its-not-just-streaming-content-you...

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#62
post #54
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately they make arguably the best OLEDs and webOS is pretty decent to use (especially compared to the terrible OS that Samsung and Sony run). I think the best thing people can do is update their firmware then disconnect it from the internet. Using an AppleTV or similar provides a better experience than any TVs built in apps anyway.

How important is "the best" OLED vs the second best or 100th best OLED? I am personally ok not buying the bleeding edge to not get malware onto my OS.

If you care about malware you do not plug it into the internet. I think windows computers are pretty mallwareish as well or at least spyware. People who buy Oled buy them because they care about PQ.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#63
post #26
post #18

My TV doesn't know my router's wi-fi password.

Pretty sure they can get internet through the HDMI cord from Roku or similar device

This again? Yes, it’s in the spec. No, no one has been shown to have actually implemented it. No streaming box is going to allow random devices to use their connection.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#64
I'm very worried with all this bullshit around TVs.

I've been running the same Samsung UE40C6530 since 2010. It's 16 f'ng years and the thing works flawlessly like the first day. No other electronic device in my life worked so well, during so long.

But I'm about to move to a new home, and it feels like it's about time to get something more modern, at least a 4k TV.

But I'm honestly totally lost at what to buy. I do not want a "Smart" tv that's slow to start, bloated with crap, installing updates every day, and maybe even spying on me.

I want a plain, old, normal TV. If possible without Android or any advanced operating system. Just a TV. I'll plug external content myself, either via a Chromecast device, or something similar. I don't want my TV to be a full fledged computer.

Is there such a thing? What would you buy nowadays? It seems you're forced to get yet another computer to maintain and be worried about whatever you buy.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#65
post #18

My TV doesn't know my router's wi-fi password.

My TV thinks it's January 1st 1970.

Every time anything asks for a DOB or anything like that, I enter the earliest date their system allows. Been doing it for decades.

I guess that might make me more trackable?

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#66
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. I bought a Samsung TV and there isn’t a way to set up Art Mode without the internet. So first you have to get a raspberry pi, install pi hole, then switch your router’s DNS. What a wild experience 2026 is. But I do feel like a wizard.

They might hardcode DNS. It's not certain that this will work.

You can intercept normal DNS with iptables rules.

The best way to deal with a TV you don't trust is what no one wants to hear.

Open up the back and disconnect the wifi antenna. It is easy to open them up and everything is pretty simple and obvious once you do.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#67
42% of the apps on LG's platform have these quasi-malware SDKs in them? Seems kinda bad, whether it's due to negligence or just pure incompetence? You'd think there might be legal consequences for a corporation that lets their app store turn into a malware delivery system?

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#68
post #54
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately they make arguably the best OLEDs and webOS is pretty decent to use (especially compared to the terrible OS that Samsung and Sony run). I think the best thing people can do is update their firmware then disconnect it from the internet. Using an AppleTV or similar provides a better experience than any TVs built in apps anyway.

How important is "the best" OLED vs the second best or 100th best OLED? I am personally ok not buying the bleeding edge to not get malware onto my OS.

reasonably important, if you're never connecting your lg tv to any network, and just connecting it to an AppleTV or something and letting HDMI-CEC control it so you never even see their OS.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#70
post #40

None of my TVs are connected to the Internet. That said, I could really do with a better open source fullscreen UI, especially since I mainly just want a web browser that works good. I'm just using KDE Plasma with a custom daemon to control the TV power state over an HDMI CEC adapter plus an old K830 keyboard. I'm, frankly, a bit annoyed by this whole thing; I'd rather have USB adapter RF wireless because it is simpl…

K400+ user here, you might be interested in the upcoming Framework Wireless Touchpad Keyboard.
Post reply on HN