Live data from Hacker News

LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

krebsonsecurity.com

41–50 of 549 posts

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#42
One day there will be a decent TV that can be relatively easily hacked to run on open source firmware. My wife and I are moving soon, and I'm happy we've decided not to have a TV in the new place. Neither of our current LG TV's have ever been connected to the network, but it will feel good when I sell or give the cursed things away.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#43
post #35
post #30

Stop hooking up your LG tv to any network

Stop buying LG TVs.

Unfortunately they make arguably the best OLEDs and webOS is pretty decent to use (especially compared to the terrible OS that Samsung and Sony run). I think the best thing people can do is update their firmware then disconnect it from the internet. Using an AppleTV or similar provides a better experience than any TVs built in apps anyway.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#46
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hope you don't have any open WiFi networks nearby. IMO it's better to put it on one of your networks and isolate it from the internet and other devices.

Yes. I bought a Samsung TV and there isn’t a way to set up Art Mode without the internet. So first you have to get a raspberry pi, install pi hole, then switch your router’s DNS. What a wild experience 2026 is. But I do feel like a wizard.

They might hardcode DNS. It's not certain that this will work.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hope you don't have any open WiFi networks nearby. IMO it's better to put it on one of your networks and isolate it from the internet and other devices.

I haven't seen any open WiFi networks around me in years. I don't think it's a thing anymore; it's definitely not something a TV company can rely on.

They're not unheard of in cities. Hotels and shopping malls have them. Some residential ISPs will also broadcast a public access point using a slice of each customer's bandwidth allocation...

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#48

Sharing a slice of your internet in a privacy preserving way in exchange for something of value, seems fair, no?

No.

I'm surprised Comcast or some other ISP doesn't step in with a claim of tortious interference. Reselling or granting access to the ISPs services like this is almost always against the ISPs terms of service.

The consumer is in no place to consent to this exchange.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#49

Sharing a slice of your internet in a privacy preserving way in exchange for something of value, seems fair, no?

Grey market residential proxy service providers are one of the most common methods of implementing bot spam, social media manipulation and plenty of straight-out fraud. There's all kinds of things that malicious actors want to do where they value coming from an ordinary (comcast, charter, centurylink, shaw cable, whatever) residential IP.

Just because others abuse privacy doesn't mean that we should remove privacy from everyone else. They also let you get around geoblocking.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#50
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently at least one of the apps mentioned does that. From the article >A Pac-Man smart TV app from Bright Data offers users the choice between viewing ads in the game or agreeing to allow their TV to serve as a residential proxy node.

I wonder how informed the end user actually is, and if it's disclosed to them what kind of content might pass through their network as a result of agreeing.

Most traffic is normal scraping like checking amazon prices.
Post reply on HN