As always, benchmarks rarely paint the whole picture. It also seems like this article is somewhat biased, eg when Fable and Kimi are close but Fable wins it’s “dead heat”, but when Kimi wins it’s “Kimi wins”. GPT 5.6 seems to be missing as well. I am really eager to give Kimi K3 a try, but I’ll reserve my judgement until I’ve worked with it for at least a few days.
Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
31–40 of 491 posts
Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
hmm almost like the exact race-to-the-bottom + arms-race dynamic all the doomers have been warning about
Doom for whom?
Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
For regular chat users it's $19 while Claude is $20...
$20 users don't get access to Fable. It's $100+ tier only.
Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#34Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#35Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#36Is there something specifically with Kimi that's better here? As far as I know Kimi pricing is about the same as Sonnet 5 -- what happens if you use that model and Fable instead? Or Grok 4.5 which is even cheaper?
Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#37I use DeepSeek exclusively and now Kimi K3 offers a great planning assistant for more advanced coding tasks.
DeepSeek v4 Flash is extremely fast and is able to handle pretty much anything I've thrown at it (I use mostly Rust, PSQL, Angular and Terraform).
I self host Bifrost as my LLM gateway, though I wish LLM vendors would do monthly/daily automatic billing (like VPS providers do) rather than prepaid + auto-top up.
It's annoying maintaining a non-refundable minimum balance across vendors, I would rather be billed for my exact usage.
OpenRouter helps, but I don't really like it as a service and not a fan of the mark up.
Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
$20 users don't get access to Fable. It's $100+ tier only.
True. However, I believe most non-programmers don't need access to the fanciest model, but just want to use a good LLM without constant nagging about usage limits. Then 19 vs. 20 is true?
Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#39Why SoTA (uppercase “T”) instead of SotA (lowercase “T”) ? “State of [T]he Art” versus “State of [t]he Art”. If not SotA then at least SOTA, which is more accurate.
Re: Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
One man's offensive penetration tool is another mans defensive tool. In the recent HuggingFace/OpenAI incident the safety controls stood in the way of the defenders, not the attackers: https://www.thestack.technology/hugging-face-hacked-turned-t...
You're presenting further evidence of lack of effective control over these systems as... a mitigating factor...?