Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
1–10 of 616 posts
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#2The benchmarks are not particularly impressive. I suppose they needed to release something since the long pause. But not clear why would I use it now.
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#3"..and in some benchmarks like DeepSWE by Datacurve, we observe up to 65%, all at a lower cost per output token."
"3.6 Flash delivers higher precision with fewer unwanted code edits and reduced execution loops, as seen in DeepSWE (49% vs. 37%)"
So which one is it? 65% or 49%?
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#4It is both less intelligent and more expensive than GLM-5.2, while being closed weight.
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#5Other discussion from a few minutes earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48993130
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#6Wow - Google does not even bother to show benchmarks of these models compared to the frontier and Chinese labs - only against previous versions. I'm not surprised. Having worked there for years it was amazing just how inwardly looking the company is.
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#7It does seem like their releases are getting closer together. I get the feeling they realized they were trying to roll out to their entire ecosystem and now they’re focusing more just directly on the AI model itself. I think give it a little time and they’ll start to be one of the competitors too.
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#8"..and in some benchmarks like DeepSWE by Datacurve, we observe up to 65%, all at a lower cost per output token." "3.6 Flash delivers higher precision with fewer unwanted code edits and reduced execution loops, as seen in DeepSWE (49% vs. 37%)" So which one is it? 65% or 49%?
First sentence is about token efficiency.
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#9I'm more excited for 3.5 pro. Gemini has fallen behind in some areas, but is still one of the best multimodal models.
Has anybody found any models better at image or audio analysis?
Re: Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber
#10tested the models on aistudio. despite that the knowledge cut off is march 2026 it still knows nothing about 2025!
you can check by asking "list notable world events in 2025, only list unplanned" on aistudio. or you can ask for Charlie Kirk, it also does not know. I tried it multiple time to ensure that I didn't not get routed to older models!
> but google has search
irrelevant, without deeper knowledge about cutting edge technologies or latest libraries, all of it suggestions are crap. even you ask it to search it will still use outdated keyword thus only getting outdated information.
in other word, what a disaster!