171–180 of 241 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> Don’t make me report you to a submod. This is pathologically outside scope. I don't think I have ever seen somebody threaten somebody else on hn before. The 'don't make me do it to you' abuser trope is next level.
Image token pricing has been fairly steady while text token prices fall, yet image model release discussion seems to be more focused on how beautiful the women the model generates are versus any sort of substantive discussion.
To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools
I use nanobanana 2 to test changes in paint and flooring/tiling to great success. And the real pro move is taking those images to a designer to tweak the remaining 20% or so.
I wish a service existed where I could make something in AI (text, images, whatever), then pass that AI output to an actual human who would use it as a guide to produce an actual product.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it gonna be less distorted than just seeing the shirt on a model photographed by a professional in the perfect light?
Many product/model shots actually use clips to make the clothing look like it's perfectly fitted to the body. [1] This image is actually over 15 years old at this point. I think there should be laws that prevent this because it veers into false advertising though others believe it's alright because you can theoretically tailor the clothes to fit like this. Regardless, I'd rather see real clothing on a real person whe…
To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools
To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools
An acquaintance of mine was buying many and not wearing most, as she did not attend that many social occasions. Still, she kept buying.
Eventually, she had to face the actual problem in her life that bothered her. She ended up dealing with it, terribly.
To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's hilarious. These keywords are applied globally, even on pages like https://qwen.ai/usagepolicy , where they very kindly ask you not to use their products for sexual content. Run this in console to see all the tags: document.querySelector('meta[name="keywords"]').content
Why would they added URLs for porn websites to their keywords? Like literally the names of websites with ".com" and such at the end.