Live data from Hacker News

Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

qwen.ai

161–170 of 241 posts

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#161
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

WTF lol who made qwen stefani's dress spiderman into the spider verse did qwen meet Peter qwen stacey porn do blake shelton and qwen stafani have children together

ben 10 four arms porn qwen These keywords are kinda wild.

Which LLM do you think they used to generate the keywords

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#163

What I can not wrap my head around: How are these models trained? What training mechanism or model architecture provides the glue to go from human text to images? Don't you need to have millions of really descriptively labelled images?

Short answer yes.

Slightly longer answer for older text to image models you teach them how to encode images and text into the same latent space. Then you simply do a conversion, take a text input, put it into latent space and then extract the image that latent space represents.

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#164
post #33

To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools

Good or bad, I’m pretty sure showing things in the best light has always been the point of “marketing”. There is a reason ads aren’t filled with ugly people with misshaped bodies, and it isn’t because the intention is to reflect reality, so what you allude to as problematic is what a lot of businesses call a feature.

I'm pretty sure I saw somewhere people can sell re-sell clothes. They can include a picture of themselves wearing the item and it replaces literally everything but the clothing with someone/someplace "prettier".

In the end the one thing that is completely honest is the portion of the picture that is the item you are re-selling. But somehow to me the entire thing feels disingenuous.

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#165
post #33

To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools

The short-term goal of a tool like this is to sell products. The more ambitious long-term goal is to shift cultural norms, blurring the lines between advertising and reality until the question you're asking is no longer consciously asked. At least, not by average people, and not at the point of purchase. I find it easy to envision a world, maybe 50 years from now, in which the very concept of "truth in advertising" i…

> I find it easy to envision a world, maybe 50 years from now, in which the very concept of "truth in advertising" is viewed as a lost, idyllic fantasy.

From what I hear (fact-check, etc. needed) that's already the case right now with much more consequential transactions, like renting real estate in NYC. Square footages that are blatant lies, etc.

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#166
post #33

To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools

Is it gonna be less distorted than just seeing the shirt on a model photographed by a professional in the perfect light?

[deleted]

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The worst I've seen changed the view out a window from an alley to a private garden. Most also add natural light that isn't possible, and in some cases I'm convinced the generate image is depicting the space as larger than it actually is, with furniture and spaces that wouldn't fit in reality

I once heard about a company that specialized in making furniture about 10% smaller than normal for use in show rooms to make the spaces look larger. Not surprised they do it with AI if they can.

This is a thing in show homes on new-build estates in the UK. British houses are often tiny.

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#168

The meta keywords in the HTML is very interesting. 100+ references to NSFW topics such as hentai, nudes, etc.

What value does the 'keywords' meta tag even have these days? 77+ KB of crap added to the page weight. Web development is full of idiots.

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#169
post #33

To me it feels so weird that people are trying to push these model for online shopping like "here is how this dress/shirt/pants would look on you". But these models will always make the clothes fit your body and show you in flattering light and so on. How the actual garment fits is still as elusive as before these tools

The short-term goal of a tool like this is to sell products. The more ambitious long-term goal is to shift cultural norms, blurring the lines between advertising and reality until the question you're asking is no longer consciously asked. At least, not by average people, and not at the point of purchase. I find it easy to envision a world, maybe 50 years from now, in which the very concept of "truth in advertising" i…

> I find it easy to envision a world, maybe 50 years from now, in which the very concept of "truth in advertising" is viewed as a lost, idyllic fantasy.

I find it easy now!

Re: Qwen-Image-3.0: Rich Content, Authentic Details, Deep Knowledge

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow you really weren't kidding. Fully automated AI slop tentacles for everyone! https://pastes.io/uenL6X9K It also seems to have an obsession with this celebrity, based on how many times ctrl-f for "stefani" turns up a result. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwen_Stefani

Wow, crazy things - "shemale porn", "spider fucks venom", and various porn URLs like tushy.com. What the hell did they do to their AI? Is that the training corpus or intended use case?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN