Live data from Hacker News

China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

werd.io

871–880 of 978 posts

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#871

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> given the enormous costs The costs are enormous only in America. The actual cost is much lower. American technogy in general is ridiculously overpriced -- compare the cost for raw compute on AWS versus Hetzner for example.

Apples to oranges. The AWS premium buys you a much broader platform with autoscaling, dozens of instance families, managed databases, serverless products, IAM, global regions, etc.

Shit that 99% of CRUD app SaaS don't need.

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#872
post #808

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iphone is 50x better? because you get a blue box around your text rather than green? androids and iphones are approximately the same thing the kinda obvious direction LLM training can go is into the direction of particle physics, and the training is set up democratically and through universities and via multi-state funding then the resulting weights end up open, the same as the particle detection data

> androids and iphones are approximately the same thing Yet... Android holds 70.6% of global active devices to iOS at 28.7%, but iOS captures 64.2% of consumer app spend. [1] > and the training is set up democratically and through universities and via multi-state funding Possible, certainly. But this case also applies to China and its "open-weights" strategy. They won't be able to form companies either or get ahead.…

"Things on my phone cost more, so its clearly a better phone."

Based on the above stat, it sure seems like Androids more versatile and inexpensive for a much larger group of users.

Hmm...that sounds familiar....

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#874
Hacker news is so one-dimensional when it comes to China. Its like people here are living in an alternate dimension where everyone outside the horizon is playing catchup. Imo a sandboxed local expert handheld or mobile AIs are the future. They'll be open weight and maybe even open sourced if we ever figure out a way to beatdown training costs. And I find that pretty exciting. There will be some bloodbath on the Wallstreet for sure but I don't anticipate or shiver anticipating double digit losses from any major corp.

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#875

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder what the thinking inside NVIDIA is at the moment. They have countless examples to learn from here, about the danger of not being willing to cannibalize your high end products. But, of course, there’s a reason that there are lots of examples of this sort of failure. There’s plenty of competition that would be happy to attack them from below, though…

Make money while there's money to be made then pivot to the next scheme? Gaming > Bitcoin > LLMs > Robotics Jensen's job is to just be one step ahead of the market dynamics to keep the investor dollars flowing.

That might seem like obvious pivots in hindsight , but there’s no way to make such easy predictions going forward.

“Jensen’s job is to just be one step ahead of the market” — how is that a “just”? That’s arguably one of the most difficult things to do reliably (judging by how much payout it can give you). Feels like saying he’s making “just” billions of dollars.

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#876

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 15 months ago, the top model on the Artificial Analysis index was GPT-o3. It scores 30 on the Artificial Analysis index. There must be something really of with those benchmarks. Yes, hallucinations gotten better, but I don't see that the big frontier models got so much better in the last 12-18 Months. They just put out bigger wall of texts and feel smarter. But they still make way too many stupid errors

12 months ago "way too many stupid errors" was constant news. Today, you rarely hear about those anymore. Sure, the novelty of the errors has worn off a bit and thus the reporting. Nevertheless the quality has improved immensely in this regard. Also, AI video generation is now so good and accessible that it is very, very regularly used for memes, disinformation and proper (short) movie projects. AI image generation e…

> Today, you rarely hear about those anymore.

Maybe people just got bored of reporting and reading about them.

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#877

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why did Google give Android away for free?

But they could do that because it didn’t cost them hundreds of billions of dollars to create Android and they could retain 99% of control over end users.

Because Android was the door to there services. That's very much the same situation we have with model creation right now. China understood it, they act on it and as a result they are winning.

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#878
post #386

The lesson of the last 50 years of the computer and software marketplace is that free and low-end eventually wins. - PCs destroyed minicomputers. Mainframes survive, but serving a much tinier portion of the market than they used to. - PC office productivity software destroyed expensive professional products. - Windows (low end) and Linux (free) completely destroyed the UNIX marketplace, and again, have taken huge mar…

The problem (right now) is that Open Weight models depend right now on huge companies to spend billion of dollars to train and develop them, all backed up by their incentives and their state to support this, while essentially giving away their monetization path. With open source projects, the benefit was that each individual could improve the complex system (e.g. Linux Kernel) interpedently, and over time the benefit…

Who funds the majority of cutting edge scientific research?

Is it companies or is it governments?

If governments around the world see LLMs built from public knowledge as pre-competitive as the public knowledge itself, then why wouldn't they sustainbly fund it?

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#879

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At least China is being consistent: they do not give a single f*ck about intellectual property or copyright…but they also give away all this distilled knowledge away for free. I’m not an American so I don’t particularly like the idea of giving an American cartel of AI companies having so much power over this technology. I don’t necessarily buy into the “China bad”, “they are communists” and all that BS either. I will…

They're dumping, dude. They subsidize important industries so they can give it way so cheaply that free markets can't compete, and when those companies fail, they swoop in and make a profit. uber did the same thing with taxis! This isn't a free resource - it costs billions to build out the infra and maintain the inference to provide this, and you think they're doing it out of the goodness of their hearts lol. Come on…

I know they are dumping. I also believe this is one of those “right thing for the wrong reasons” kind of situation.

> at least admit you're happier giving china your data than the us

Yeah of course I am. How many schools has China bombed using AI to pick a target?

I’m Canadian. Being anti-American is in my DNA.

Re: China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning

#880

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, OpenAI and Anthropic say the Chinese models are only as good because they distill their models. How true is that. I am sure it adds something. But is it more like a marginal 1% improvement or something really significant?

if distilling was so easy and could give you frontier LLM on openai/anthropic output, then how come there are no hundreds of frontier labs in the US market, all distilling and competing for the TRILLION dollar market valuation ???? its all bs spread by oai/anthropic in order to ban open weight models and monopolize the market for two US companies and protect their trillion dollar valuations

Because you will get sued by openai/anthropic
Post reply on HN