Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

I'm Done with Mullvad

moonwriting.blog

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

211–220 of 243 posts

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#211

Post by tpm »

nopromisessir wrote: post #144
g-b-r wrote: post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"They will also be forced to leave, even if they are born in Sweden, because they have no natural connection to Sweden. They are not Swedish" I don't see any mention of crimes, having jobs or "being a disproportionate drain" (however you define that).

I do not speak Swedish, but I looked into this via machine translation. My understanding is that the discussion can be found around this timestamp link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4goynP4mHYI&t=1h18m43s According to the machine translation, Allard explicitly frames his argument around cultural assimilation, economic contribution, and behavior rather than biological ethnicity or skin color alone. In public stateme…

> it would be pretty self defeating to just charge onto the stage going full Nazi

Sadly no, in 2026 going full Nazi genocidal maniac mass murderer in waiting seems to be broadly acceptable for a politician, in the next few years we can expect the "in waiting" part will be dropped somewhere.

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#212

Post by vitalyan8184 »

AlexeyBelov wrote: post #195
surgical_fire wrote: post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> reasonable immigration laws made multiple European cities non-European. According to your definition of what "non-European" means

It's a troll account. Their previous one: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=vitalyan1234

[flagged]

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#213

Post by t0bia_s »

charcircuit wrote: post #49
t0bia_s wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you consider governance of majority to minority as a part of free society?

>Do you consider [giving] governance of [the] majority to [the] minority as a part of free society? I do not consider that as a requirement free society. While representational democracies give governance to a small amount of people compared to the overall populace theoretical you could have a society where everyone was on equal footing and all contributed to decisions being made.

Equal to what?

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#214

Post by inigyou »

g-b-r wrote: post #174
dijit wrote: post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this kind of slippery slope is why I hate vague rules on forums, let alone national laws. Selective enforcement of those you find disagreeable is a way of bullying people with impunity. That said, I'm curious on how you would solve the issue that Sweden is faced with. It is a very outsized, pronounced, issue and the legal system in Sweden is not equipped to deal with it. The Swedish legal system prioritises rehabilit…

I don't know why your comments keep dying, btw, I vouched for them

I assumed he was shadowbanned because he wants an ethnic cleansing

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#215

Post by inigyou »

Gud wrote: post #114
inigyou wrote: post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, this guy's party would end that toleration because you don't have Swedish ancestry. Is that good?

No, not all all? Markus Allard doesn't seem to want to kick out productive members of society.

Who decides who those are, eh?

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#216

Post by Gud »

inigyou wrote: post #215
Gud wrote: post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, not all all? Markus Allard doesn't seem to want to kick out productive members of society.

Who decides who those are, eh?

I think it’s pretty straightforward, and I suspect most people do. If your working and paying taxes and otherwise integrating, you are.

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#218

Post by streetfighter64 »

sph wrote: post #210
CommanderData wrote: post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes I don't support racism in anyway.

Neither do I, but I hate authoritarianism (and hypocrisy) even more. People are free to have different opinions than mine, and I will defend their right to do so. I remain a happy Mullvad user.

People are free to have their opinions, that doesn't mean you need to fund them. If you don't at least on some level agree with the politics, why are you giving them your money?

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#219

Post by streetfighter64 »

lapkaaaa wrote: post #12
muldvarp wrote: post #5

> Some key issues for the Örebro Party locally include strong secularism, a 30-hour workweek with retained pay, lowered wages for politicians, expanded social housing, abolishing preschool-fees, making public transport free of charge, ending taxpayer funding of what it sees as wasteful sculptures, monuments and art and introducing free dental care. Nationally the party has set out large-scale remigration, closing the…

That sounds "We're for everything good and against everything bad so vote for us pls"

Uh, isn't that exactly what you'd want out of a political party? I wouldn't vote for them because I disagree with a few of their points, but if you think all of their policies are good and you trust them to uphold them, then go vote for them?

Re: I'm Done with Mullvad

#220

Post by streetfighter64 »

dijit wrote: post #60
inigyou wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You tend to trust people because they have strong opinions even if those opinions are completely psychotic? Does that mean you would have trusted the German dictator if you were alive back then?

1) I wasn't alive. 2) My parents weren't alive 3) my grandparents weren't alive. 4) he was running a country, not a company thats entire purpose was to protect peoples privacy 5) had people taken privacy seriously, there would be a lot less dead people in Europe, famously the dutch kept meticulous records of their populations which is part of why the Nazi's were so effective.

> I wasn't alive

How would you feel if you hadn't eaten breakfast today?

Post reply on HN