Live data from Hacker News

Agent swarms and the new model economics

cursor.com

51–60 of 159 posts

Re: Agent swarms and the new model economics

#51
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If at the end Shakespeare-level literature is produced, does it matter whether we arrived there by random keystrokes?

The problem is the infinite other literature produced along the way. It doesn't work to throw more monkeys at the problem of verification, and checking for matches against existing Shakespeare plays is cheating.

don't worry, we can get another swarm of random monkeys typing and decide what ones to eliminate .

tijebs gi yo,

Re: Agent swarms and the new model economics

#52
This post describes ideas found in existing agent orchestrator systems since they've existed. You'll find the same "top level agent that breaks a problem down into spec / plan / implement / verify" pattern in get-shit-done or superpowers.

Is the original part the VCS that works at 1000 commits/second? Or spending a bunch of money comparing models?

Re: Agent swarms and the new model economics

#54
post #25
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that's true, but in the post, they even mention that building the spec is the scarce resource. For that to work, the swarm has to actually follow the spec, which is what much of this post is about. We gave the swarm 835 pages of prose and it came back with a database. What was scarce in this experiment, and what we expect to be scarce in software engineering going forward, is the right description of intent.

We're rediscovering the "architect" job role a decade or so after switching to agile processes and staff engineers largely replaced it. God help us when they rediscover UML for agents.

I feel like the scarcity of (idealized) Product Managers is even more acute.

Re: Agent swarms and the new model economics

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's hard not read such quotes and immediately think of the Infinite Monkey Theorem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

If at the end Shakespeare-level literature is produced, does it matter whether we arrived there by random keystrokes?

Shakespeare-level literature was produced. We are the infinite monkeies, and one was shakespeare.

Re: Agent swarms and the new model economics

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's hard not read such quotes and immediately think of the Infinite Monkey Theorem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

If at the end Shakespeare-level literature is produced, does it matter whether we arrived there by random keystrokes?

> does it matter whether we arrived there by random keystrokes?

Douglas Adams said this beautifully in the Campaign for Real Time & the poet Lallalfa.

And I just found out h2g2.com is no longer online, so no reference.

Re: Agent swarms and the new model economics

#58
post #53

This is almost a year behind Steve Yegge's first post on beads. Gas Town and Gas City provide orchestration for the swarm. So far I haven't seen a perfect implementation but this idea isn't new.

Does every peice of prose published here have to be novel? is it not enough for you to read a new. perspective?

Re: Agent swarms and the new model economics

#59
post #53

This is almost a year behind Steve Yegge's first post on beads. Gas Town and Gas City provide orchestration for the swarm. So far I haven't seen a perfect implementation but this idea isn't new.

I don't think Gas Town was actually all that much ahead of the curve - see Cursor's swarm post from January this year, mentioned at the very top of this blog post.

I also don't know that beads is a very strong example that Yegge knows what he's doing - it's famously been described as (pseudo)malware.

Post reply on HN