1–10 of 10 posts
India's Modi is using Technology to change election campaigning
nextbigwhat.com
For the uninitiated , Narendra Modi was the CM of gujarat when gujarat violence happened http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_violence
Given how low internet penetration is in India , this kind of thing cannot have much of an impact at the grassroot level.
Also, there's a matter of who is being targeted; you could probably draw strong parallels with Obama's strategy of targeting the young and educated.
Given how low internet penetration is in India , this kind of thing cannot have much of an impact at the grassroot level.
For the uninitiated , Narendra Modi was the CM of gujarat when gujarat violence happened http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_violence
For the uninitiated , Narendra Modi was the CM of gujarat when gujarat violence happened http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_violence
And the point is? He has done a lot for his state. Which is India's most progressive and prosperous.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the point is? He has done a lot for his state. Which is India's most progressive and prosperous.
Gujarat may be prosperous (this is open for debate), but I'm not sure a place that still has alcohol prohibition is India's 'most progressive' state.
For the uninitiated , Narendra Modi was the CM of gujarat when gujarat violence happened http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_violence
Given a choice which one would you choose - A skilled and able administrator with a dodgy past or a corrupt, bureaucratic and sycophantic bunch of people who have a history of such incidences spread over half a century.
Yes Modi has his faults but he is preferable over the alternative, though I would be loath to see he become more autocratic - a distinct possibility .