My question is, are they actually deporting people efficiently? Because if they are accumulating people in these facilities, it could become dangerous. They have been dehumanizing them for months. If there are constraints for food supplies, staff are not going to risk their jobs to keep prisoners fed. There needs to be a law for video audits every X weeks. Or there is a real risk of starvation in some places. Some of…
Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
11–20 of 30 posts
Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#12My question is, are they actually deporting people efficiently? Because if they are accumulating people in these facilities, it could become dangerous. They have been dehumanizing them for months. If there are constraints for food supplies, staff are not going to risk their jobs to keep prisoners fed. There needs to be a law for video audits every X weeks. Or there is a real risk of starvation in some places. Some of…
They need to be abolished, not reformed.
Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#13When specific movies were poorly reviewed on Rotten Tomatoes, apparently because they thought they were not genuine,the company pulled the reviews. This is no different. I seriously doubt most of them are genuine and instead a way to post political commentary inappropriately.
[flagged]
Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#14Google has routinely removed respectful, factual, but low-rated reviews I've left for restaurants and other places just because someone complained. They have also cleaned up or disabled reviews for many public institutions in some (or all?) countries. Then there are cases like Germany, where even a 3-star review may be automatically removed because it's considered potentially defamatory. I understand that ICE is a ve…
Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#15Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#16Of the 4,700 newspapers published in Germany when the Nazis took power in 1933, no more that 1,100 remained. Approximately half were still in the hands of private or institutional owners, but these newspapers operated in strict compliance with government press laws and published material only in accordance with directives issued by the Ministry of Propaganda.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-press-...
Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#17My question is, are they actually deporting people efficiently? Because if they are accumulating people in these facilities, it could become dangerous. They have been dehumanizing them for months. If there are constraints for food supplies, staff are not going to risk their jobs to keep prisoners fed. There needs to be a law for video audits every X weeks. Or there is a real risk of starvation in some places. Some of…
They need to be abolished, not reformed.
Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#18Google has routinely removed respectful, factual, but low-rated reviews I've left for restaurants and other places just because someone complained. They have also cleaned up or disabled reviews for many public institutions in some (or all?) countries. Then there are cases like Germany, where even a 3-star review may be automatically removed because it's considered potentially defamatory. I understand that ICE is a ve…
Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#19Re: Google Is Censoring Reviews of ICE Detention Centers
#20When specific movies were poorly reviewed on Rotten Tomatoes, apparently because they thought they were not genuine,the company pulled the reviews. This is no different. I seriously doubt most of them are genuine and instead a way to post political commentary inappropriately.
[flagged]