Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe, maybe not. The "proofs" may not have helped at all with finding a counterexample. Either way, it doesn't matter. A counterexample was found, no one found one before even though clearly a lot of people have tried who also had access to the prior "proofs".
This makes me wonder, what if anyone uses Fable-class LLM and passes of its novel results as their own work? There's no shortage of folks doing that in software, right now.
Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
111–120 of 562 posts
Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#112Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#113Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#114For all thehubbub, as far as I know, all the math breakthroughs via AI that I've heard about have come from Anthropic and OpenAI, not Chinese models. I could have missed those announcements, but one might think that between close to frontier performance plus cheap tokens, that they'd be leading the way on these things.
Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#115This is a rare instance where feeding this groundbreaking information into an LLM gives _them_ psychosis. I fed this to claude code and watched it verify the result in 7 different ways to be 100% certain, and it was just flabbergasted. Quite remarkable.
Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#116For all thehubbub, as far as I know, all the math breakthroughs via AI that I've heard about have come from Anthropic and OpenAI, not Chinese models. I could have missed those announcements, but one might think that between close to frontier performance plus cheap tokens, that they'd be leading the way on these things.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#117But I'm curious—can Fable handle cases where n=2 as well?
(NGL I wanted to suggest someone to go for the JC using 5.6 after the CDC proof came out, but then on reflection felt I should neither waste people's time NOR contribute to the myth of AI :)
My prediction is that the bubble will burst in 2031 Q4, one year after the Riemann Hypothesis is expected to fall (according to Demis)
After 2031, I will suggest going for the JC for N=4 because they would (dis)prove the Dixmier conjecture for N=2 :)
https://xcancel.com/BrunsJulian1541/status/20790734625601334...
Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#118Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#119I just fed this to GPT 5.6 Sol: Counterexample to Jacobian conjecture: ((1+xy)^3 z + y^2 (1+xy) (4+3xy), y + 3 x (1+xy)^2 z + 3 x y^2 (4+3xy), 2 x - 3 x^2 y - x^3 z): \C^3\to \C^3, has jacobian determinant -2, and sends (0, 0, -1/4), (1, -3/2, 13/2), and (-1, 3/2, 13/2) to (-1/4, 0, 0) GPT wrote some SymPy code to check it. The response? "As written, this is an explicit counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture. I ch…
Re: Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture
#120For all thehubbub, as far as I know, all the math breakthroughs via AI that I've heard about have come from Anthropic and OpenAI, not Chinese models. I could have missed those announcements, but one might think that between close to frontier performance plus cheap tokens, that they'd be leading the way on these things.