Live data from Hacker News

Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

neatnik.net

141–150 of 210 posts

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this really true? "A friend of mine" has been running a Jellyfin server behind Cloudflare tunnels for years and hasn't had any issue.

I would guess they only take action when they get a DMCA complaint and that wouldn't happen if you only share privately with friends.

They can also take action if they decide you're wasting their bandwidth or (especially) cache space. It's not allowed to host video files on any free cloudflare plan due to cache space.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The registry is spread out across a whole decentralized network of computers of which has another decentralized network of computers that proxy requests exists. Ultimately, someone has to be in control of who is or is not part of that decentralized network that is the registry. (Or, alternatively phrased, how are you preventing me from saying "I'm part of the .crypto registry, totes .") Aside from that, the root na…

>Ultimately, someone has to be in control of who is or is not part of that decentralized network Ethereum is an unpermissioned network. Anyone is free to join or leave at anytime. >how are you preventing me from saying "I'm part of the .crypto registry, totes.") The registry would be a smart contract. There doesn't fundamentally need to be an owner. >how are you preventing me from saying "I'm part of the .crypto regi…

Blockchains have complicated permission systems which isn't the same as having no permission systems. Remember when Vitalik reversed a DAO smart contract transaction he disagreed with? It leaves a cloud of mistrust over Ethereum to this day. There's no reason to think it couldn't happen again.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#143
post #83

Old guy here, wild that people don't know this. Like, I have fiber and a static IP. Never much thought about hosting a website from my house because it didn't seem all that special. Maybe I should?

Note that most ISPs don't allow it on residential plans, but also won't stop you unless you actually create some kind of problem (no ISP actively polices it). If you're rich you can pay more for a business plan (at your home) which would explicitly allow it.

It's fine to host something for friends on a residential ISP. They don't care. If you want to make it a public website it's more uncertain. Still don't worry though, because they won't just ban you from the internet. Worst you'd get is a phone call telling you to stop it.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#144
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you can go ipv6 only, any good isp will give you a static /56 for free. practically none of your users have ipv4 only devices when every major os has been dual stack by default for like 15 years. if your isp cant give you one its time to switch as soon as you can.

My ISP is only ipv4. It doesn't matter if an OS technically support ipv6 or not.

You can get a Hurricane Electric free static v6 tunnel.

They have poor reputations and are blocked from streaming sites and so on. But when you're the server, that doesn't affect you.

Note that you need a static v4 and DMZ because the tunnel protocol is a very simple one - presumably because they run it on giant routers. It just puts a v4 header in front of the v6 header. No TCP or UDP.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#145

I arrived at a pretty similar system starting from similar goals. https://rustyswarf.com , which runs on a very simple framework called Travail. In practice, I found cloudflare necessary to deter bots/crawlers. It is indeed fairly cheap, but you're still dependent upon three entities you don't really control: the DNS, the host, and Cloudflare.

You don't need to deter bots and crawlers. Cloudflare wants you to think you do.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Considering many people doesn't know what a file is, keeping the spirit alive is important, I think.

I encountered juniors straight out of school who don’t know what tar is, or rsync, or what a symlink is. It’s all learnable and everyone starts somewhere. But you’d think natural curiosity would kick in and they’d have picked up some of this on their own by the time they have a job.

For what it’s worth, I recently retired from a 30 year career as a developer and while I’m aware of all three of those things, I’ve never used any of them in or out of work.

And I’ve hosted my own web server these last 20 years.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#147
I appreciate the sentiment but can't quite tell who the author is targeting. Is it people who don't even know what HTML is, or those who are technical enough to have considered tradeoffs between web hosting options?

For complete beginners, I made https://weejur.com , which is designed to make it easy for even a complete beginner to paste in HTML and get it hosted on GitHub Pages for free. (And is also hosted itself on GitHub for free!)

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never understood this mentality. Why can't they still sell your data after you pay them? Porque no los dos?

So never bother with anything, am I right? Anything could be bad. Why eat the burger instead of the cyanide pill when there could be cyanide in the burger?

and almost every paid service too. Paid or unpaid is not a useful characteristic for determining if something will sell my data.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#149
post #121
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The field of software engineering is dominated by the smart people that do something not because they have to but out of curiosity. Emphasis mine. We wish. I think the state of tech pretty conclusively demonstrates those people aren’t the ones who dominate. Money and power hungry tech bros do, which is why everything is shit and exploitative.

The tech bros are the ones that control the companies, not the field of software engineering.

They’re both. There are finance tech bros “idea guys” whose aim is to be at the top of the company, and other tech bros who got into programming for the high salary and clout of being able to say they work at or are ex-employees of Facebook, or Google, or whatever.

The shit and exploitation don’t build themselves.

Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, sure, windows. But here’s one I heard literally two days ago: we counted three engineers (out of many) who knew that physical memory was not actually a giant flat space of contiguous addresses, and that there were multiple layers of address-mapping and region-joining glue logic between a program and the hardware, including in os libraries, and even inside the hardware. Maybe knowing such information is archaic or…

But physical memory is a giant flat space of contiguous addresses. Do you mean virtual memory?

I almost questioned the same thing but I think we both know that's what he meant.
Post reply on HN