I just cannot come up with a good AI-is-actually-24/7-helping-me-out use case. Please help: I wánt to need this!
Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
171–180 of 213 posts
Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#172Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
I said vendor here but it’s more like banks we work with. So there’s someone responsible for the technical side of banking relationships. But yeah it’s kinda a zone where most weekends there’s no problems so it’s not a huge priority… until it is
somehow having a contact at a bank who works on the weekend is more difficult to believe than a random vendor
Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#174I just cannot come up with a good AI-is-actually-24/7-helping-me-out use case. Please help: I wánt to need this!
I run a lot of data science-type analyses that can take up to hours at a time to run, so Claude is « monitoring » tasks most of the time. I have it on remote-control so I get notified when a task is done or need clarification, but most importantly whenever I have a new idea, I can just ask Claude to queue it up. Most of the time my hardware is the bottleneck, not the subscription quotas.
Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
> and then just wait for the next prompt A single session running for multiple hours is prohibitively expensive, as per Anthropic. Regardless of whether it just waits for a prompt or does something.
Is the high expense coming from cache misses? If their workload does need to wait for a long time before it can continue, I wonder would starting new sessions and having to re-read the contexts and results anyway be any cheaper.
Yup. They can't keep your workload in cache forever, or they would run out of cache for users.
> I wonder would starting new sessions and having to re-read the contexts and results anyway be any cheaper.
Yes, that's what they recommend
Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's less about 24/7. It's more about it can't work when your laptop is in your bag and in transit and there is something that you have set up and want to run.
Oh yeah sounds great working in your free time and while traveling to buy groceries to feed yourself so you can continue working.
It could be for a personal project or hobby.
Having independently running processes from the computer you carry around offers benefits.
Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah these guys will set up claude on their third pc after they realize their second pc keeps hallucinating out code nobody cares about or needs in hopes of staying relevant. I'll just keep coding by hand because I ACTUALLY ENJOY it. What a novel concept these days.
Just letting you know you're not alone in coding by hand.
I too confess to writing code by hand. It… works for me?
Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#178Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
It launches these tasks in the background. It became really good at it a couple of months ago, now it sets monitors on timer (not something I instructed, so I assumed it’s part of the system prompt for this kind of tasks) and then just wait for the next prompt, for the background process to be done, or for a monitor to trigger a checkup.
> and then just wait for the next prompt A single session running for multiple hours is prohibitively expensive, as per Anthropic. Regardless of whether it just waits for a prompt or does something.
Re: Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide
#180It's so strange to me that tech crowd uses macs for use cases that spend all their time idle or serve some light http request. It's a glorified API gateway...it could run on a medium sized potato Almost like an entire generation just grew up coding on macbooks as the obvious choice for coders and just can't conceptualize hardware outside of that walled garden
idle = doesn't have to be H200 speeds
uses macs = local LLM can use all the ram, be smarter
as for hosted models, potato is tasty