Earlier quoted context omitted.
Big fan of nextest and this is my first time seeing this site. I'll be real I feel a bit ridiculous commenting this but you might want to consider rephrasing this: >Treat tests as cattle, not pets. Detect and terminate slow tests. Not sure saying, "hey, treat your tests as an animal you can kill at will" paints the right image.
Jesus Christ do we seriously need to limit our speech and get rid of perfectly good analogies for every special little snowflake?
Cargo-nextest: 3x faster than cargo test, per-test isolation, first-class CI
51–53 of 53 posts
Re: Cargo-nextest: 3x faster than cargo test, per-test isolation, first-class CI
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Big fan of nextest and this is my first time seeing this site. I'll be real I feel a bit ridiculous commenting this but you might want to consider rephrasing this: >Treat tests as cattle, not pets. Detect and terminate slow tests. Not sure saying, "hey, treat your tests as an animal you can kill at will" paints the right image.
This is from the Kubernetes saying of "treat servers like cattle, not pets". Of course, some people like me keep cattle as pets, but then again I also name my servers, even the virtual or containerised ones.
Re: Cargo-nextest: 3x faster than cargo test, per-test isolation, first-class CI
#53Thanks for posting about this! I'm the main author of nextest, and it represents my best foot forward for how Rust testing should be done. Happy to answer questions though I might be a bit intermittent.