Earlier quoted context omitted.
Considering many people doesn't know what a file is, keeping the spirit alive is important, I think.
I encountered juniors straight out of school who don’t know what tar is, or rsync, or what a symlink is. It’s all learnable and everyone starts somewhere. But you’d think natural curiosity would kick in and they’d have picked up some of this on their own by the time they have a job.
Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
31–40 of 210 posts
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
However, it'll also bring all the bots and "wild west" of the internet to your house when you run your web server from home, and for anyone who has a couple of spare dollars, it's a much wiser choice to run a small VPS elsewhere to weather the storm.
shrug In 25 years of hosting a dozen domain names on a server on my home connection, this problem has not surfaced for me.
Especially if you host something like wordpress with plugins you really have to be on the ball with updates.
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#33now the real fun part is how to self-host it on a machine accessible on the net without services like cloudflare or tailscale tunnels.
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#34Kind of funny that this is like some strange new concept... Having a web server and putting your stuff on it.
Considering many people doesn't know what a file is, keeping the spirit alive is important, I think.
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#35https://rustyswarf.com, which runs on a very simple framework called Travail.
In practice, I found cloudflare necessary to deter bots/crawlers. It is indeed fairly cheap, but you're still dependent upon three entities you don't really control: the DNS, the host, and Cloudflare.
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
You need a static IP address for this to work is the downside, and depending on where you live and who your provider it it can be difficult and/or expensive.
you can go ipv6 only, any good isp will give you a static /56 for free. practically none of your users have ipv4 only devices when every major os has been dual stack by default for like 15 years. if your isp cant give you one its time to switch as soon as you can.
I don't think ipv6 only is feasible yet unless your audience is exclusively in Asia where ipv6 uptake is much higher due to them running out of ipv4 years ago
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Cloudflare tunnels for free. I could replace that with port forwarding You could replace it with something better, like pangolin, either their cloud or even self host it too, and that way you can tunnel to other stuff like if you have a media server where you can watch your movies from anywhere in the world.
Yeah I find it a bit funny when people self host to get away from cloud and then use Cloudflare tunnels.
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Considering many people doesn't know what a file is, keeping the spirit alive is important, I think.
I encountered juniors straight out of school who don’t know what tar is, or rsync, or what a symlink is. It’s all learnable and everyone starts somewhere. But you’d think natural curiosity would kick in and they’d have picked up some of this on their own by the time they have a job.
Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#39Re: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day
#40now the real fun part is how to self-host it on a machine accessible on the net without services like cloudflare or tailscale tunnels.
I host my site on my own home server, but I do have a proxy ec2 server to tunnel public traffic via wireguard back to my home server. This keeps things a bit more protected and my router/home network not directly exposed. I'm also not locked into AWS, I just use them for convenience, but could get any other cheap proxy to run wireguard. No dependency on tailscale either, it's just nicer interface to wireguard. Wireguard config is like 5 lines btw.