London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says
#2Good thing we're all wearing face-masks to avoid cold, flu, and COVID-19, right?
Re: London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says
#3Good thing we're all wearing face-masks to avoid cold, flu, and COVID-19, right?
Thise face masks are useless against anything that doesn't directly spray in your face.
Re: London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says
#4When you come home and sneeze black after a few minutes on the platform twice a day, it's safe to assume that's not great for your lungs...
Re: London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says
#5Good thing we're all wearing face-masks to avoid cold, flu, and COVID-19, right?
[dead]
Re: London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says
#6Good thing we're all wearing face-masks to avoid cold, flu, and COVID-19, right?
Thise face masks are useless against anything that doesn't directly spray in your face.
When I breath in face mask clings tighter to my face, meaning the air gets filtered, meaning that unless this dust is smaller than viruses, they'd help.
Of course depends on what face masks you'd be using. Surgical are of not much help, but other than that efficiacy has been studied and confirmed very high in that last pandemic, which spread mostly by airborne particle, not droplets (so contrary to your claim they protect).