Live data from Hacker News

Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

forbes.com

21–30 of 46 posts

Re: Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

#21
post #4
post #2

[flagged]

What has Flock ever done for the US people? At least the Chinese Police State lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty next to the terrible things they’ve done. I’m saying this only part jokingly but one has to wonder where exactly are all the real benefits promised by those sinking the US deeper and deeper in surveillance.

The Chinese lifted themselves put of poverty. The state just stopped keeping them down.

The people deserve the credit. Not the state.

Re: Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

#22

American's don't want to live under constant surveillance, inside an open air prison. That idea should not be hard to understand.

I'm glad to see this is a bipartisan issue that both sides agree on. As a country we need to start focusing more on the issues we have in common and work towards solutions to them.

Re: Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

#24

American's don't want to live under constant surveillance, inside an open air prison. That idea should not be hard to understand.

Many people want surveillance on other people that they're afraid of, or have been told to be afraid of. Some openly want to try to establish that asymmetry. Others are willing to unthinkingly submit to surveillance themselves as long as it surveils their perceived enemies.

Re: Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

#25
post #13

I think it’s important to highlight that the timing of this article comes right after Tucker Carlsons monologue and podcast “Flock Cameras and the Coming Slave State”. Would wager a bet this is a paid piece for Forbes for PR damage control. Garrett probably thought by making those statements a year ago he could get political support from the current administration and population. Looks like that was a bad bet. I actu…

In a society that respects and protects privacy rights by law, the service Flock provides could not exist.

There are no 'guardrails' to mass surveillance.

Re: Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

#28
If it was just recognizing license plates that would be fine. However it fingerprints individuals by running a Bluetooth and WiFi connection to capture your phone or laptop’s Bluetooth MAC and WiFi MAC.

There are Flock cameras placed along running paths where there are no cars, and other places that would never need license plate readers.

Does Flock have a microphone that can record you talking with your friend while watching ducks at the local park?

Re: Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

#29
post #27

As a reminder, Flock is a ycombinator company. Unrelated, in about a minute this post went from the front page to the third page.

Flock has a large amount of popular stories here, there's no conspiracy.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Re: Flock CEO Apologizes for Calling Activists 'Terrorists'

#30

If it was just recognizing license plates that would be fine. However it fingerprints individuals by running a Bluetooth and WiFi connection to capture your phone or laptop’s Bluetooth MAC and WiFi MAC. There are Flock cameras placed along running paths where there are no cars, and other places that would never need license plate readers. Does Flock have a microphone that can record you talking with your friend while…

>If it was just recognizing license plates that would be fine.

not really.

I don't want any private entity to catalogue humans identifiably to a population-scale extent.

if we as a collective whole wanted these things around they (Flock) wouldn't have to buy their positions from the regional municipalities.

Post reply on HN