Live data from Hacker News

Decoy Font

mixfont.com

141–150 of 172 posts

Re: Decoy Font

#141
Have a reason to believe that your product constitutes plagiarism: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06508v1

Copyright (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. How-ever, permission to use this material for any other purposes must be obtained from the IEEE by sending a request to pubs-permissions at ieee.org

(blurred email in case of spams)

Re: Decoy Font

#142
A natural extension would be a reverse steganography that trips AI into see other things in images

Re: Decoy Font

#144
I expected this to be a font which shuffles characters and glyphs (requiring more effort to type it) resulting in nonsensical text but visually readable page.

Re: Decoy Font

#146

I only see the hidden text, not the decoy. I am colorblind but there are no colors; probably has something to do with it though.

you have to squint, but I don't get why this is so upvoted

similar to recent submission "Ghost Font: A font that humans can read but AI cannot" - which wasn't even a font, but some animation which turned out could be read by LLMs

I dunno, seems like more and more nonsense makes its way to HN recently

Re: Decoy Font

#148

Have a reason to believe that your product constitutes plagiarism: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06508v1 Copyright (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. How-ever, permission to use this material for any other purposes must be obtained from the IEEE by sending a request to pubs-permissions at ieee.org (blurred email in case of spams)

That's a stretch. This isn't a new approach to such obfuscation. Also plagiarism would mean they ripped the source material verbatim or they at least copied the methodology and intentionally used the source material's findings as their own.

It's super unbelievable they needed to. This isn't novel.

Post reply on HN