Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 55 posts

Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?

#17
When the LLM starts doing dumb shit I start cursing it like a sailor who had been a pig farmer.

It makes me feel better, but doesn't help.

I just see:

Thinking: The user is unhappy. I need to .... (and then probably the same dumb shit again).

LLMs are useful but sometimes fucking frustrating dumb shits of loose transitors.

Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?

#18

No, it doesn’t have feelings - it would be like asking your washing machine to please wash your pants? Anthropomorphising LLMs seems deeply unhealthy.

What if politeness is correlated to higher-quality answers in their mess of a "database"?

Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?

#19

No, it doesn’t have feelings - it would be like asking your washing machine to please wash your pants? Anthropomorphising LLMs seems deeply unhealthy.

What if politeness is correlated to higher-quality answers in their mess of a "database"?

[dead]

Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?

#20
I do. I'll compliment the model or give it a thumbs-up emoji. If you watch a model's thinking stream you can see that the model is always attempting to assess the user's intent, including emotionality.. '...the user is expressing uncertainty about.. ' or '..the user is expressing appreciation for..' etc. and this influences the overall response and sometimes even their decisions. It's a language model, so why not use language to convey info about what you're feeling to the model, it understands that language too.
Post reply on HN