Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
1–10 of 55 posts
Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#2Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#3Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#4But, more honestly, it's just a social habit and saving keystrokes isn't worth training myself out of it.
Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#5Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#6Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#7Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#8I do. I justify the action via mechanical / prompting logic (my instructions are to treat me as an informed peer and my understanding is that keeping the whole conversation in "two peers talking" register makes it easier for the LLM to maintain that mode). But, more honestly, it's just a social habit and saving keystrokes isn't worth training myself out of it.
Re: Ask HN: Do you say please and thank you to your LLMs?
#9I used to, but it just means an extra round of conversation, so I stopped.
> please do $x
>> $x
> thanks. Now do $y
If I have ever spent a whole turn on something that could be called a thank you is was something like "the way you answer that [in specific way] was very helpful – thanks. Can you please remember to raise that sort of point in the future?" So still not an extra round