These are awful. It’s like Suno music. Seems convincing if you half listen. As soon as you pay attention you notice all the cracks.
$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
51–60 of 581 posts
Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#52> None of the music videos were great Glad they acknowledge this. Curious how much time in addition to tokens this costs. If you have to spend $25 and wait 45 minutes to get a basically unwatchable video, I'm not worried about indie film makers being replaced just yet...
Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#53Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#54Unsure if it's just the way they prompted it / coded it, but the output is far too much a literal direct copy of the lyrics. The best music videos have a story arc on the theme of but often not litearlly the lyrics, and start with obscurity and reveal something (following all the literary/story mechanisms) Consider Amber Run - Found lyrics versus the video, and the story arc of the video https://www.youtube.com/watch…
Literal music videos are still fun and a valid creative direction, e.g., Vance Joy's "Riptide": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ_1HMAGb4k
Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#55These are awful. It’s like Suno music. Seems convincing if you half listen. As soon as you pay attention you notice all the cracks.
Visual effects went through this same development issues as the industry matured. What took this industry decades to advance it taking months in AI. Think the spaghetti Will Smith and now this. Another one people don't mention here but is specific to video is higgsfield ai.
Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#56Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#57Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who has marketed music, shot music videos, directed music videos, cut music videos together from stock footage: you don’t need auteurs. You did back when MTV made songs big. No one actually pays attention to the details of music videos any more. It’s visual chewing gum at best. The reality is that now, if you have something half decent, nice colours, nice lighting and a wee bit of a story, no one is going…
> No one actually pays attention to the details of music videos any more. It’s visual chewing gum at best. Hilarious to hear someone in industry blame their audience for the commodification of the medium. Is every industry like this? Surely nobody goes into creative fields thinking “I can’t wait to feed the masses slop!” Who’s killing our spirit?
Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#59These are awful. It’s like Suno music. Seems convincing if you half listen. As soon as you pay attention you notice all the cracks.
Visual effects went through this same development issues as the industry matured. What took this industry decades to advance it taking months in AI. Think the spaghetti Will Smith and now this. Another one people don't mention here but is specific to video is higgsfield ai.
Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
#60https://www.minimax.io/news/minimax-hailuo-23
(No affiliation, I just want to see how well they work).