Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

tryai.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 581 posts

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#21

Post by lwkl »

LPisGood wrote: post #12

Regular music videos (including the writing/recording) can easily go into 6 figures. I wonder what the $200,000 AI music videos looks like.

But why spend the same amount of money on AI instead of humans? My guess is that shooting a music video is probably fun for a lot of artists. And with AI the result is not predictable and might be inconsistent in the dumbest ways.

My guess is that an AI music video would have to be a lot cheaper for artists to consider it outside of making one just because you want to make an AI music video.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#22

Post by siwakotisaurav »

AI videos as in remotion based videos look much better imo since it can code much better than it can prompt for videos with a coherent narrative

https://youtu.be/uDAeAuYyl0E (parody of Claude announcements) https://youtu.be/cSsVNtGPOIg (recreating a fireship video)

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#23

Post by therein »

anonova wrote: post #11
maerF0x0 wrote: post #3

Unsure if it's just the way they prompted it / coded it, but the output is far too much a literal direct copy of the lyrics. The best music videos have a story arc on the theme of but often not litearlly the lyrics, and start with obscurity and reveal something (following all the literary/story mechanisms) Consider Amber Run - Found lyrics versus the video, and the story arc of the video https://www.youtube.com/watch…

Literal music videos are still fun and a valid creative direction, e.g., Vance Joy's "Riptide": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ_1HMAGb4k

Coincidence that both songs reference Michelle Pfeiffer or was that free connotation at work?

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#25

Post by sushid »

siwakotisaurav wrote: post #22

AI videos as in remotion based videos look much better imo since it can code much better than it can prompt for videos with a coherent narrative https://youtu.be/uDAeAuYyl0E (parody of Claude announcements) https://youtu.be/cSsVNtGPOIg (recreating a fireship video)

This is incredible! Did you make these yourself? I am familiar with remotion but this is a lot more than just splicing images, etc.

Did you use a skill library to make this?

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#27

Post by echelon »

nzoschke wrote: post #7

> None of the music videos were great Glad they acknowledge this. Curious how much time in addition to tokens this costs. If you have to spend $25 and wait 45 minutes to get a basically unwatchable video, I'm not worried about indie film makers being replaced just yet...

Directors and editors using Seedance can fire the film studio.

This is a fundamental shift in how storytelling is funded and made, not in who does the driving.

Same as is happening with code.

Post reply on HN