Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

tryai.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 581 posts

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#11

Post by anonova »

maerF0x0 wrote: post #3

Unsure if it's just the way they prompted it / coded it, but the output is far too much a literal direct copy of the lyrics. The best music videos have a story arc on the theme of but often not litearlly the lyrics, and start with obscurity and reveal something (following all the literary/story mechanisms) Consider Amber Run - Found lyrics versus the video, and the story arc of the video https://www.youtube.com/watch…

Literal music videos are still fun and a valid creative direction, e.g., Vance Joy's "Riptide": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ_1HMAGb4k

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#13

Post by qurren »

nzoschke wrote: post #7

> None of the music videos were great Glad they acknowledge this. Curious how much time in addition to tokens this costs. If you have to spend $25 and wait 45 minutes to get a basically unwatchable video, I'm not worried about indie film makers being replaced just yet...

I'm classically trained and I honestly can't really tell how these are worse than the human produced ones. They all look kinda the same to me.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#14

Post by dataviz1000 »

maerF0x0 wrote: post #3

Unsure if it's just the way they prompted it / coded it, but the output is far too much a literal direct copy of the lyrics. The best music videos have a story arc on the theme of but often not litearlly the lyrics, and start with obscurity and reveal something (following all the literary/story mechanisms) Consider Amber Run - Found lyrics versus the video, and the story arc of the video https://www.youtube.com/watch…

In an interview, an adult actress was asked about the things she says during scenes. She said she describes what is happening literally at any moment.

This is what LLM models do.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#15

Post by echelon »

LPisGood wrote: post #12

Regular music videos (including the writing/recording) can easily go into 6 figures. I wonder what the $200,000 AI music videos looks like.

You don't need to spend $200k, because results can be bad for cheap.

https://youtu.be/HDdsKJl92H4

Though we're finding the studios contracted to do this can bill $50k. I know several studios that previously billed clients six figures for ad campaigns (P&G, HBO, pharma, etc.) are now charging five figures and winning a lion share of the bids now.

Not sure why Wan is the focus of this article and Seedance is a footnote. Wan/LTX/open models are significantly behind Chinese closed source models. (And the Chinese have left the Western models in the dust.)

I wouldn't do anything production grade in Wan.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#17

Post by Forgeties79 »

anonova wrote: post #11
maerF0x0 wrote: post #3

Unsure if it's just the way they prompted it / coded it, but the output is far too much a literal direct copy of the lyrics. The best music videos have a story arc on the theme of but often not litearlly the lyrics, and start with obscurity and reveal something (following all the literary/story mechanisms) Consider Amber Run - Found lyrics versus the video, and the story arc of the video https://www.youtube.com/watch…

Literal music videos are still fun and a valid creative direction, e.g., Vance Joy's "Riptide": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ_1HMAGb4k

That’s not really the same thing.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#18

Post by Sohcahtoa82 »

bubblegumcrisis wrote: post #4

Wow. These are horrible. Sort of refreshing. I thought video was better than this now, but I guess not.

Video can be good if you stick to a garden path of simple scenes with tons of examples in the training material and not a ton of motion between overlapping objects in a scene, and don't really care too much about specifics.

As soon as you want something very specific, or something novel, or anything with a lot of moving objects/people, it falls apart.

Re: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

#20

Post by Waterluvian »

anonova wrote: post #11
maerF0x0 wrote: post #3

Unsure if it's just the way they prompted it / coded it, but the output is far too much a literal direct copy of the lyrics. The best music videos have a story arc on the theme of but often not litearlly the lyrics, and start with obscurity and reveal something (following all the literary/story mechanisms) Consider Amber Run - Found lyrics versus the video, and the story arc of the video https://www.youtube.com/watch…

Literal music videos are still fun and a valid creative direction, e.g., Vance Joy's "Riptide": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ_1HMAGb4k

The thing about art is that literally everything is a "valid creative direction." But that doesnt make everything immune from derision.
Post reply on HN