Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Firefox in WebAssembly

developer.puter.com

81–90 of 134 posts

Re: Show HN: Firefox in WebAssembly

#82

I've been waiting for this to happen. The websites that don't want you to block ads will serve you an obfuscated "inner browser" that will render their site. All your ad blockers, etc, are rendered moot. Once accessibility is solved this is absolutely going to be a thing on major websites.

Great, looking forward to needing 16GB RAM to watch youtube :(

Re: Show HN: Firefox in WebAssembly

#84

Browser sandboxing is now fully solved.

In mean... It kinda feels like this is legitimately true? An attacker trying to do anything on a user's machine through this would have to find a Firefox vulnerability and a vulnerability in the wasm runtime, which is such a high bar that I would actually feel remarkably safe running this thing. The only question is how performance works and whether there are any pain points using as a daily driver, but those feel li…

Unless you're running every origin in a different instance, I wouldn't use this as a daily driver, since a site would only need to find a renderer vuln to be able to read the rest of your cookies as multiprocess isolation is disabled here

Re: Show HN: Firefox in WebAssembly

#88

I've been waiting for this to happen. The websites that don't want you to block ads will serve you an obfuscated "inner browser" that will render their site. All your ad blockers, etc, are rendered moot. Once accessibility is solved this is absolutely going to be a thing on major websites.

Assumes bad actors care about accessibility in the first place

Re: Show HN: Firefox in WebAssembly

#89
post #34

>This port cost over 25k in opus/fable tokens for debugging and JIT research > This was just a fun experiment to push the boundaries of WebAssembly I'm a huge fan of the project, but I have to ask. If spending $25k is a "fun experiment", where exactly is your threshold for serious work?

Was it really $25k, or was it done though subscriptions with a reported cost of $25k? I'm on the openai $100 sub and frequently my codexbar will show $250 usage in a day. I think it probably doesn't have access to the cached token share too, which probably inflates that a lot.

The latter
Post reply on HN