71–80 of 134 posts
- IME / keyboard doesn't pop on any field
- copy paste
- scrolling with touch
- ai side panel
What works on mobile :
- Extensions !
This is so sick great work; did you try webgpu?
Browser sandboxing is now fully solved.
In mean... It kinda feels like this is legitimately true? An attacker trying to do anything on a user's machine through this would have to find a Firefox vulnerability and a vulnerability in the wasm runtime, which is such a high bar that I would actually feel remarkably safe running this thing. The only question is how performance works and whether there are any pain points using as a daily driver, but those feel li…
All the network traffic from that browser is routed through a server. My IP inside that browser was in India and on CloudFlare network. I don’t particularly trust Puter. Why not route traffic through my actual browser?
i never did some wasm but seems it runs quite fast on my macmini m1
It's kind of ironic how this doesn't work in Firefox.
macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 (25F84)
Firefox 152.0.5 (aarch64)
It's kind of ironic how this doesn't work in Firefox.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Why not route traffic through my actual browser? Because you can't. Not even an Extension is able to. Browsers don't want you to bypass their content enforcement. I wish we had at least one hacker friendly browser.
Extensions can't, correct but I wanted to bring up a special case regarding this Isolated web apps a chrome feature for developing apps that run in chromium based on HTML (but tbh only really used in Chromebooks) do support raw TCP sockets so if this was ported to an IWA you could have Firefox on a Chromebook without an external server needed.
25k tokens to port Firefox to WASM. by 2027 we'll be spending 25k tokens to port WASM back to native because someone will benchmark it and find the WASM version is 3% faster.