Book prizes don't work how you think
rebeccamakkai.substack.com
Book prizes don't work how you think
1–10 of 97 posts
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#2I wonder how the reviewers feel when authors like Ursula K. Le Guin refuse awards
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#3There is room for LLMs to disrupt book judging by being able to read every single book.
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#4Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#5>1) Not every judge can look at every single book; and 2) When a judge realizes they don’t love a book, they can put it down. There is room for LLMs to disrupt book judging by being able to read every single book.
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#6https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/letter-from-the-...
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#7>1) Not every judge can look at every single book; and 2) When a judge realizes they don’t love a book, they can put it down. There is room for LLMs to disrupt book judging by being able to read every single book.
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#8> I’ve judged prizes both pre-2020, when we were sent stacks of books, and post-2020, when everything had switched to zip drives and online databases.
Considered medium-to-high-capacity at the time of its release, Zip disks were originally launched with capacities of 100 megabytes (MB), then 250 MB, and finally 750 MB. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_drive
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#9Book Prizes Do Work How I Think.
It's just like, someone's opinion, man.
Re: Book prizes don't work how you think
#10>1) Not every judge can look at every single book; and 2) When a judge realizes they don’t love a book, they can put it down. There is room for LLMs to disrupt book judging by being able to read every single book.