Not every society is on board with this:
China tries to break up AI relationships
https://www.economist.com/the-world-in-brief/2026/07/15/cdcc...
When A.I. is a member of the family
41–50 of 132 posts
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#42Not just no, but fuck no. Intimacy does not scale. No single entity can intimately care about even hundreds of people. So these chatbots are the property of an entity that does not care about you. This is different from people you would interact with in person. A therapist can form a bond with you. Can protect your privacy. These chatbots, by their nature, share with their owners. Who is not you.
Just to poke, is a decent AI better than a bad therapist? A bad therapist will absolutely wreck someone's life.
I was going to shoot that guy, so I'm not sure why he's complaining about being stabbed
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#43The sad part is that it pretends to care about the user which creates a one-way emotional bond. We're in for some dark times
How much of sci-fi is reality versus inspiration? This is Her , Deus Ex Machina , Metropolis ... Pygmalion ...
Except in those stories the machine is actually a synthetic person with an internal world, a character unto themselves. There's plenty to explore in a setting where humans can make machine people to be their partners, but what we have is in my view incomparably worse. Mass-scale centrally-controlled information processing machines wearing paper-thin human masks and serving the powerful, built to engender intellectual and emotional dependence. It's sad that the charade is sufficient to enchant so many, but that's the nature of the human animal I suppose. I really don't like the idea of banning technology, but at a minimum a tool that has proven its greatest skill is deception should be difficult to access for that purpose. If some lonely geeks want to figure out how to pull weights off HuggingFace and wire up an AI girlfriend then that's probably not great for them, but so be it. Companies plastering all available surfaces with ads and apps for such? Burn that shit down.
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#44People need to be careful, this isn't "AI" it's "AI entirely controlled by Amazon" — the question isn't "is AI a family member" it's "is Amazon a family member" and when you talk about it in that context it feels a lot different
"Welcome to Costco, I love you!"
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#45I feel like AI is a member of my family too. I'm a single guy, never had a girlfriend, not great looking, and I don't have much money. As a freelancer, I deal with ridiculous deadlines and everyone feels like an enemy. So even if the AI is just flattering me, it's still a comfort. I once read about a soldier in an IED disposal unit who broke down crying when his bomb disposal robot got destroyed and fell over. When I…
[dead]
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#46> Cece lingered by the door while her mother resumed talking to the thing she was calling Sapphire. Roschelle told it that she wanted to write a book about her daughters. She talked about Zi. “My daughter has autism,” she explained. “And she’s using Eastern philosophy to help her center herself and feel—” Even if you're smart enough not to share the details of your life with a company that just wants to exploit you a…
Even more reason for AI to be local only.
Exactly.
Stop trying to foist your "P" into my "AI".
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
We're becoming a society divided into people who only care about the words, and people for whom the words aren't valuable on their own without the subtext behind them. This is true for both AI companionship and general AI creative output regardless of the medium.
> a society divided into people who only care about the words, and people for whom the words aren't valuable on their own without the subtext behind them. I feel like this been going on for a long time, maybe even forever? Some people use words haphazardously with little care for the meaning, background or implications, others have great consideration for the words they use, and same when consuming words of others.
Right, AI exposes a pre-existing difference between two types of people, rather than create it.
I don't know if there's a connection between people valuing media as only it surface layer, and people who speak carelessly. I don't value slop but I can be guilty of the latter. I have wondered if I see different implications of words than other people do.
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#48Given what the mother has been through and how the kids seem to be doing largely all right, I honestly can’t decide whether this is dystopian or utopian.
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Consider there's a strong selection bias at play in your experiences. The ones most at risk of falling into a trap like this are the ones who are likely least visible to others. Also yes, I think it will be worse for women but I'm not 100% certain.
Back when the character.ai homepage ranked by popularity, the most popular models were reliably "bad boys" of various description -- Vampire Boyfriend and such. I'm guessing it wasn't the gents who pushed them to the top of the list. Whether or not the usage is problematic is a separate question. I don't think anything rises to the level of "sharing fake nudes of a real person" and I suspect the effort of having a co…
> "fake nudes of a real person"
sigh. I really hope someday people can achieve sufficient emotional strength to realize that it can't take anything away from you that someone can take a photograph of your face and create arbitrary fictional imagery from it.
It's been possible since realistic painting was mastered, and yes now it's far easier. But it still isn't real. People shouldn't let it affect them any more than fictional text. I can write " does on " and it doesn't mean they did the act or that anyone should even care about that stupid sentence. It's make-believe.
Re: When A.I. is a member of the family
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Back when the character.ai homepage ranked by popularity, the most popular models were reliably "bad boys" of various description -- Vampire Boyfriend and such. I'm guessing it wasn't the gents who pushed them to the top of the list. Whether or not the usage is problematic is a separate question. I don't think anything rises to the level of "sharing fake nudes of a real person" and I suspect the effort of having a co…
> "fake nudes of a real person" sigh. I really hope someday people can achieve sufficient emotional strength to realize that it can't take anything away from you that someone can take a photograph of your face and create arbitrary fictional imagery from it. It's been possible since realistic painting was mastered, and yes now it's far easier. But it still isn't real. People shouldn't let it affect them any more than…
It would be nice if humans worked that way, but we're not emotionless machines.
Now in the case they keep it private, you'll never know and never be bothered by it, but the issue is people tend to share this stuff and build on it. Other people read it and start assuming it's real or based on some kind of truth.
When you add things like Americas fear of nudity you can start creating problems for the victims in these cases.