Live data from Hacker News

Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

dev.moe

61–70 of 166 posts

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#61
post #44
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Telegram has nothing to do with Russia, other than having a Russian founder, and the Ukrainian military has literally relied upon it in the past, along with many Ukrainian civic services. You people are just racist towards Russians and need help. Based on the analysis of packet captures above, I believe it is clear that anyone who has sufficient visibility into Telegram’s traffic would be able to identify and track t…

>Ukrainian military has literally relied upon it in the past Well they realized their mistake and banned Telegram's use on state issued devices in 2024 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78dwepw95do I'm not going to speak for the author of that article. But I agree with his conclusion. Telegram is indistinguishable from a honeypot. In the world of infosec, stuff isn't secure until someone proves you wrong (which you…

The ban is just there so every village cop may have something against you if they need it.

Besides that, they know and, as it seems, to be happy about it's wide availability and information.

Having their own app, they obviously also use for their causes, is just a cookie for the patriots.

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#62
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is slow? I don't understand what there is to accelerate.

The main things that are slow are loading the app and opening the app, loading the messages, and receiving the messages. On my phone, this is much slower than Telegram, and on my computer, the WhatsApp program doesn't even work have the time -- it just gets stuck in the loading process. Signal is not as bad, but can still take a minute or two to update everything on my computer. The phone app is better.

Sounds more like your personal problem.

I live in Germany and use both. None do that and as I'm "the IT guy" for many people at work an din private, I'd have heard about it. Hell, the whole continent would have heard about it as whatsapp is widely used.

My Signal also doesn't do that.

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#63
post #50

The more I learn about telegram, the sketchier it seems.

Agreed. I don’t see the appeal compared to Signal. Although, Signal is also sketchy with an operating cost in the tens of millions of dollars per year. Where does the money come from?

I’ve always been under the impression that Signal is for secure, private chats and group chats amongst friends and small groups. While telegram is often used more like discord or irc, with “secure” and “private” group chats that are extremely large and semi-public. “Invite only” but invites are handed out easily. Those chats are pretty obviously not as secure, as basically anybody can join them and decrypt the chat. On the surface its somewhat more secure than discord, where discord will be scanning all chat content.

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#64
post #49

Are people still using Telegram? What is the upside compared to Signal?

Good ux, pleasant to use. A large community and lots of channels with all kind of content. Api is also great for spinning a bot for whatever purpose. I have for example a critical error bot for a production server running. If a critical error occurs, I get an immediate telegram message.

Sounds a lot like we might as well use Discord?

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#65
post #51
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. I don’t see the appeal compared to Signal. Although, Signal is also sketchy with an operating cost in the tens of millions of dollars per year. Where does the money come from?

- Telegram has exemplary fast, native clients on most platforms I’ve used it on - Cat stickers - Did I mention it has the best native clients out of all the messaging apps? It boggles the mind why other companies can’t get this done.

Probably still doesn't beat ripcord

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#66

For a hot second there I was really excited to learn about historical telegram "data centers". It's a capital T.

As a tangential niche-tourism shoutout: https://www.telcomhistory.org/ConnectionsSeattle.html

Granted, most of it is a bit newer than the heyday of telegrams, but there's a little bit of overlap.

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#67
post #49

Are people still using Telegram? What is the upside compared to Signal?

Calling/ringing works reliably. My gf usually calls via Telegram to notify me and then we call via Signal

Signal can't do live location sharing

    Code blocks (let alone syntax highlighting) was the first thing my friend ran into after switching last week
In general, formatting on Telegram is a lot more versatile with >quote blocks that show up formatted as quotes and inline links without needing to have a giant message because of the giant URL

Many more image features, like you can do yellow highlighting and not only ugly shades of olive, you can put a message above an image instead of below, you can mark an image as spoiler, you can send it uncompressed, much simpler UI for selecting multiple images, etc.

Jumping to a date was one of the first things I ran into

Web client lets you temporarily use someone else's computer without needing to install software

Making a Telegram bot takes 10 minutes if you just want a simple http callback and know roughly how it works. Signal has no support at all. Some third parties have made libraries but we keep having issues at work with our internal Signal bot to the point where I think we just gave up altogether now

Many people use Telegram to check if internet works because when opening the app it does a lightning quick check and it's very robust (I think it has no problem if DNS is down, for example) Looking at the title bar confirming that it works is much faster than trying to do a random web search

You can have memorable/pretty group URLs like telegram.me/OpenStreetMapOrg

Large files can be sent (also because of server-side storage not clogging up your phone, which is a double-edged sword of course)

Scheduled messages send at the right time when you're not online & the desktop app supports scheduled messages

As of like next week you can do moderation in groups in Signal. This has of course been a thing in Telegram since 10+ years. I don't know how we'd have run the OpenStreetMap group on Telegram without being able to delete spam messages

Chats take a lot less space. The Signal authors probably don't have many contacts that they use Signal with because you can view the message markers of 4 chats before having to scroll down. In Telegram, 9 fit in view. Similar on desktop but both numbers are bigger. Messages are also more space efficient in Telegram

Telegram so so so much faster than Signal's web, ahem, electron client

The only advantage of Signal that comes to mind is the intangible property of privacy (and maybe local back-ups, so data availability, but then Signal doesn't provide software to view your backup data so is it really a backup if you can't test it and they can lock you out of the app?). I'm nevertheless switching everything over to Signal but it's often very hard to explain to people why they should give all this up for encryption. My family doesn't use all the advanced features but some techy friends do

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#68
post #50

The more I learn about telegram, the sketchier it seems.

Agreed. I don’t see the appeal compared to Signal. Although, Signal is also sketchy with an operating cost in the tens of millions of dollars per year. Where does the money come from?

Signal users who want to use it with their agents are running an unofficial extracted-and-patched `signal-cli` off GitHub. It's based on an archived official Signal repo and then patched for years by some random accounts. It looks incredibly untrustworthy.

Meanwhile Telegram has bot support and added features specifically for interacting w/agents. It's incredibly easy to write clients and work with it. No one should use it, and I never would, but you can see why it's winning.

Signal's lack of features (like an official Signal CLI) and bots (even attached to existing phone numbers and limited to the owner) is making people less secure than they could be. And unfortunately there are no great alternatives.

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#69
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good ux, pleasant to use. A large community and lots of channels with all kind of content. Api is also great for spinning a bot for whatever purpose. I have for example a critical error bot for a production server running. If a critical error occurs, I get an immediate telegram message.

Sounds a lot like we might as well use Discord?

Discord is annoying af to use, slow and bloated like the rest of them. Really it all comes down to UX when anyone asks why use Telegram.

Re: Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)

#70
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good ux, pleasant to use. A large community and lots of channels with all kind of content. Api is also great for spinning a bot for whatever purpose. I have for example a critical error bot for a production server running. If a critical error occurs, I get an immediate telegram message.

Sounds a lot like we might as well use Discord?

How is that any better? Still no e2ee, proprietary, arguably worse UX for chat purposes.
Post reply on HN