Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
21–30 of 49 posts
Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#22Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#23Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Won't that slow you down a lot? I get it in principle, but in practice if you have to review everything your coding agent does the productivity gains diminish significantly
I can’t tell if you are serious. Are you serious?
Does it matter if the developers understand the system they maintain?
I guess that depends whether the genAI maximalists turn out to be right.
Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#25> The reasoning was in a transcript on my laptop. Claude Code deletes those after 30 days by default. Two of my projects lost their whole history that way. Wait what? Claude Code (and Codex) transcripts are auto-deleted?? That's a treasure trove of information for all my projects and I had built some tooling and workflows tahat deal with extracting insights from them -- withut ever realizing I mightbe losing old chat…
Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#26> I didn't know! I didn't make that decision! Thanks for today's dose of impostor syndrome cure.
Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can’t tell if you are serious. Are you serious?
Whether or not he's serious, as someone who's grudgingly using Claude at work due to mandates, the productivity gains do shrink massively (and sometimes go negative) if you actually attempt to gain the level of understanding you'd have of the system had you written it yourself. Does it matter if the developers understand the system they maintain? I guess that depends whether the genAI maximalists turn out to be right…
Are they maintaining it if all they do is type prompts into Claude?
Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#28100% important. But what decisions do you care about seeing? The whole point of the agent is to make decisions for you. If you want to make every little detailed decision, just write the code. The whole art of this problem is figuring out which decisions matter to you, and how to surface them. (Disclosure: we're working on this too. https://tern.sh )
edit:
To me it looks like yours has the following negative qualities:
- closed source
- requires signup for some service
- says code doesnt leave my machine but this connects to your servers
- requires Goose AI as a dependency
Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can’t tell if you are serious. Are you serious?
Whether or not he's serious, as someone who's grudgingly using Claude at work due to mandates, the productivity gains do shrink massively (and sometimes go negative) if you actually attempt to gain the level of understanding you'd have of the system had you written it yourself. Does it matter if the developers understand the system they maintain? I guess that depends whether the genAI maximalists turn out to be right…
Do you have people frantically trying to reverse engineer a basically unfamiliar-to-them code base at 2am while bleeding cash?
Re: Show HN: Grepathy – Claude made a decision nobody approved
#30100% important. But what decisions do you care about seeing? The whole point of the agent is to make decisions for you. If you want to make every little detailed decision, just write the code. The whole art of this problem is figuring out which decisions matter to you, and how to surface them. (Disclosure: we're working on this too. https://tern.sh )
How does your solution differ from OPs? edit: To me it looks like yours has the following negative qualities: - closed source - requires signup for some service - says code doesnt leave my machine but this connects to your servers - requires Goose AI as a dependency
- Baseline it. We mine previous logs, github comments, etc. for "what you care about." That helps pull out decisions that you actually care to read.
- Anchor to code. "The code enshrines this decision" is more interesting than "the agent self-talked this." Agents don't always self-talk decisions, and the thing that ultimately matters is the behavior in code.
to your edit (and all totally fair):
- Yes, closed source and signup required. A lot of what we're driving towards is easy team sharing, so we're taking the bath early instead of building an OSS thing and rug-pulling later.
- Code doesn't leave your machine. There's an agent that runs locally. I know "trust me" isn't the strongest stance, but this comes from the multi-player future.
- Honestly, Goose AI is a remnant of a previous product. It's inert and we'll clean it up once we've gotten the last couple folks off the previous iteration.