Live data from Hacker News

What's in America's Code

boozallen.com

1–6 of 6 posts

Re: What's in America's Code

#2
TLDR;

”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated.

2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”

Re: What's in America's Code

#3
post #2

TLDR; ”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated. 2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”

> we do not have proof at this point that code flaws are intentionally introduced.

Re: What's in America's Code

#5
post #2

TLDR; ”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated. 2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”

> we do not have proof at this point that code flaws are intentionally introduced.

If it is the way it is (unsecure), what does proof of intent matter?