Live data from Hacker News

Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

techcrunch.com

181–190 of 213 posts

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At 250 people, you would think you're a business and no longer a startup. Once you pass Dunbar's number you probably are no longer a startup.

I honestly don't know why you'd need 250 people to run a service like Dropbox. Dropbox is a piece of software that could recreated in about a month by a smart hacker; and if you're using AWS, you don't have worry about the servers (so don't need a sysadmin/maintenance staff) -- so, theoretically could be comfortably run by a handful of skilled core engineers. Why are 250 people working at Dropbox? Is Dropbox overstaf…

> Dropbox is a piece of software that could recreated in about a month by a smart hacker;

A service running on AWS with intra-account deduplication, with signup, referrals, billing and support, Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS, Blackberry, Android, kindle and web clients, all internationalised into English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish (both European and Latin American), and an API with six platform-specific SDKs for Dropbox integration.

"About a month, one person"?

> Why are 250 people working at Dropbox?

https://www.dropbox.com/about

https://www.dropbox.com/jobs

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#182
post #127

Kind of a quirky note, but now the creators of all of the most popular web languages (Ruby, PHP and Python) have had a stint at YC companies: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2756314 http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/27/php-founder-rasmus-lerdorf-...

[deleted]

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#183
post #4

" the adventure found at a nimble 250-person startup like Dropbox becomes more tempting " What is the definition of a startup these days, anyway?

If you can hire Guido you are not a startup.

B.G. (Before Guido) it's a startup, A.G. (After Guido) it's not a startup anymore.

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#184

Speechless. This is definitely one of the best decisions that Dropbox will probably ever make. Not only will this mean that Dropbox can hire other equally great Python developers, but as a company you can't get any more humbling than, "hey we hired the guy who wrote the programming language this site is based on and makes its money from" Guido is an exceptional engineer as well, not just a guy who knows Python really…

All that, plus the fact that they hired him AWAY from Google. Matz is one of the "rare gems" in the Ruby community. So doesn't that make Guido one of the "rare eggs" in the Python community? ;)

Your joke made me literally laugh out loud in the middle of a coffee shop. Bravo, sir.

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#185
post #94

It always strikes me as odd when something like this happens. Guido is still working nine-to-fives and Drew never has to work again. Can someone tell me why a brilliant person like Guido isn't worth a billion dollars? Have tons of fancy cars and a fancy house? Has to work for another company?

because he didnt found or was an early employee of a highly successful startup, yet. Same is true for Linus and many other hacker heros, but its not a bad thing imo.

Now he is am early employee of a highly successful startup.

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is Python being phased out?

Python wasn't phased out of consumer-facing applications because it was never in. Google has a lot of machines, but those machines receive a lot of traffic. Efficiency matters, and byte-for-byte, cycle-for-cycle, Java is more efficient than Python. Don't ask me why Google didn't throw lots of resources at making Python more efficient like they did with JS and V8. I often wonder that myself.

Google doesn't run JS on its machines much. Google users run JS.

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#187

Why Guido left? That's the question.

Speaking as an ex-Googler, when I left, Python was largely relegated to glue code, scripts, internal projects, and App Engine -- consumer-facing frontends were written in Java, and backends in C++. He probably wanted to move to a company where Python was more pervasive, and he felt like he could have more of an impact, given that he _is_ the BDFL.

The dusty corners of Google where Python is relegated must add up to far more expansive use tha all of DropBox.

This isn't a Python move. It is a Guido move and a company environment move and a product move.

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#188
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They not only steal but steal at very good timing. Since Google will give their focus to javascript and go from now on :)

Go, yes. Javascript, I'm not so sure: http://code.google.com/p/dart/

Compare Googles recentbJS publications with their recent Dart publications.

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or a market that is known to be viable with a product that is not yet known to be viable. I think most people would consider Tesla a startup, but cars have been around for a century.

Yes, but in their case it's "electric cars" which is a different market.

This market also exists for a century.

Re: Dropbox Hires Guido Van Rossum

#190
post #179

It's not uncommon to see staff from Google going to another small company and then some months later, the company is acquired by Google...

I agree this is true for small companies. However Dropbox is not a small company by most measures. Also pg's remarks about how you couldn't acquire Dropbox or Airbnb for (some large dollar amount I forget) lead me to believe Google won't be acquiring them.

I'd imagine Google wants to acquire them. However I doubt Drew Houston would go that route.

Post reply on HN