does this require a real vulnerability report, or CVE? if the package is compromised would they just be able to push a false "critical update" that bypasses this wait?
Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
11–20 of 154 posts
Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#12What a state of things where we have to fear installing software, and rely on vendors to scan things ahead of time, because our supply chain is such a mess and our tooling is so incapable of (and uninterested in) protecting us.
What would a solution to this look like? What would it take to not fear installing software? This isn't a npm problem, its a computing problem in general. Spaces like this are generally pretty against any sort of restrictions or limitations being put on computers under the name of safety (see Manifest v3)
Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
You cannot call it a supply chain, if you have zero contractual relationships with the authors of the solutions you are using. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44434355
I mean, that’s just arguing over whether or not the definition of “supply” implies “compensation”, which isn’t very interesting imho. The grandparent’s point remains the same, the software ecosystem and its supply chain or however you want to call it is a hot mess.
Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#14Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#15But if everyone will be delaying updates, won't be there less chances to catch it in time? I'm not fully sure if it's possible to preventively scan all NPM packages or how much compute it would require.
Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#16If everyone starts applying cooldowns, won't it postpone the problem? So now there is a considerable amount of users who are affected and someone from the affected group discovers the infection and reports it. But if everyone will be delaying updates, won't be there less chances to catch it in time? I'm not fully sure if it's possible to preventively scan all NPM packages or how much compute it would require.
Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#17If everyone starts applying cooldowns, won't it postpone the problem? So now there is a considerable amount of users who are affected and someone from the affected group discovers the infection and reports it. But if everyone will be delaying updates, won't be there less chances to catch it in time? I'm not fully sure if it's possible to preventively scan all NPM packages or how much compute it would require.
Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#18Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#19If everyone starts applying cooldowns, won't it postpone the problem? So now there is a considerable amount of users who are affected and someone from the affected group discovers the infection and reports it. But if everyone will be delaying updates, won't be there less chances to catch it in time? I'm not fully sure if it's possible to preventively scan all NPM packages or how much compute it would require.
The majority were noticed by maintainers or third party groups noticing things like releases not tied to a source tag, many rapid releases, etc.
Cooldowns won’t stop everything, but it makes a malicious release significantly more likely to be noticed
Re: Dependabot version updates introduce default package cooldown
#20What a state of things where we have to fear installing software, and rely on vendors to scan things ahead of time, because our supply chain is such a mess and our tooling is so incapable of (and uninterested in) protecting us.
What would a solution to this look like? What would it take to not fear installing software? This isn't a npm problem, its a computing problem in general. Spaces like this are generally pretty against any sort of restrictions or limitations being put on computers under the name of safety (see Manifest v3)
No corporation could tolerate this, though, so the library vendor can negotiate a commercial license of their software for appropriate fees.
That said, corporations are not going to want to negotiate fees with 100's of vendors over constantly fluctuating dependencies in their software.
This is why the next big language/software ecosystem needs to integrate payments to vendors in their repository system. That way, commercial license management can occur between the ecosystem owners and the corporate customers and all the vendors get paid their fair share.
Similar to Amazon's Dynamo API, whatever the next big language/ecosystem is needs to be designed around _billing_ and automatic license management for # of deployments, seats, call volumes, etc.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20260712154038/https://www.gnu.o...