Live data from Hacker News

The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

thoughtworks.com

21–30 of 152 posts

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#21
I love maintaining open source in an agentic world. I can be a complete asshole about contribution rules and coding standard as long as I define the AGENTS.md. The more strict the better and I can get good clean pull request without an endless back and fourth. I can even require updating the documentation!

An OCD dream but you need to embrace it and configure it or you would get "AI slop".

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#22
post #4

I’ve stopped all my open source contributions and projects. I’ve now moved my resources to organizing and supporting communities like python Atlanta. My commitment was always the community and not the code. I also want to see what will companies do once open source closes shop and fewer people know how to program. It’s why I’m making sure there is a local support network for those of us who still want to stay in soft…

I recently set up a Forgejo instance for a personal infrastructure project, and because of security, it’s read-only. So I just disable all the “issues”, “pull requests”, “wiki”. It’s a little sad, but also gratifying to know that I’m making stuff available, but I am not looking for any and every chance to have a conversation about it.

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#23
the issue with articles that try to analyze the state of open source and its sustainability and all that is that nothing about open source makes any sense if you just talk about it. Imagine you're transported to 1977 and you work at IBM and you try to tell them, oh hey I have an idea, how about the OS everyone uses for literally all commerce, communication, military, etc., you name it, will be written by one guy in his spare time and later maintained by tens of thousands of mostly unpaid volunteers. "Don't other companies try to copy it and sell it as their own?" "Well sure, but mostly it's better to use the free one everyone knows". Try selling your manager at IBM in 1977 that idea for new software. It would be impossible. It would be impossible today.

Trying to explain how the global economy and welfare of most of humanity is hugely dependent on free software production labor, without the advent of actually seeing a world where this actually happens, is just like when we try to explain something like consciousness. There is no explanation that makes sense. So predictions about new avenues of doom (like "MIT licensing was a huge mistake! we should have all been GPL!") similarly dont carry a lot of weight, because of course these predictions make perfect sense in the abstract, yet real world results don't line up at all.

Basically open source software is an emergent phenomenon, like consciousness or evolution, or perhaps even how very large language models suddenly seemed like real people. It's something that would never be predictable in its own absence, which means it will remain largely unpredictable how it will respond to ongoing changes such as "the open source authors and contributors now use programs themselves to produce more code".

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#24

I stopped reading at "load-bearing" and em dash.

Ironically, the prevalence of AI "tells" like that (combined with the ubiquity of AI works passed off as human-written) will inevitably feed back into more use by non-AI writers who think they're normal. (Also, I'm never gonna give up my em dashes.)

This assumes non ai writers are drinking from the well of slop. Not all of course. Some people still read old books.

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#25
post #4

I’ve stopped all my open source contributions and projects. I’ve now moved my resources to organizing and supporting communities like python Atlanta. My commitment was always the community and not the code. I also want to see what will companies do once open source closes shop and fewer people know how to program. It’s why I’m making sure there is a local support network for those of us who still want to stay in soft…

I don't think the battle will be in open source software... I think it will be in hardware at our current rate.

There has been ever increasing consolidation in the hardware world along with an ever growing acceptance of restrictions by the public 'for our safety'.

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#26
The agentic era definition of open source is garbage.

Software that is not open source, is proprietary software. Open weight models, are not open source. Binary blobs in a repo with an Apache license, is not open source.

Am I a retro-grouch? Probably. I guess it doesn't matter anymore what I think about it.

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#28
This goes one of two ways.

Either the LLM public capability is not sufficient to positively contribute, or it is.

If it is not sufficient to positively contribute, open source projects become drowned in low quality contributions.

If it is sufficient to positively contribute, we end up with multiple implementations of open source projects.

Actually maybe it only goes one way.

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#29
post #19

Open-source alternatives are being launched at an ungodly pace and they are really polished. All these comments about AI Slop are underestimating how good these builders have gotten and AI lets you iterate really fast. If the builder actually uses the software he's building, the feedback loop is really efficient. I keep a directory of open-source alternatives and just in the past month, I've replaced applications I'v…

> All these comments about AI Slop are underestimating how good these builders have gotten and AI lets you iterate really fast. Both of these are true: we’re witnessing an unprecedented amount of slop, while also the tools get better and better. So when talking about Open Source maintainer exhaustion, it’s because of the slop, not because of the great tooling. AI is an amplifier, and in this case it amplifies the gre…

The 80/20 rule and bullshit asymmetry apply here.

Kind of like going to the app store and picking the app with the most downloads because the other option is looking at 400 different apps that may or may not do the same thing.

Re: The zero-cost fallacy: open-source software in the agentic era

#30

Open-source alternatives are being launched at an ungodly pace and they are really polished. All these comments about AI Slop are underestimating how good these builders have gotten and AI lets you iterate really fast. If the builder actually uses the software he's building, the feedback loop is really efficient. I keep a directory of open-source alternatives and just in the past month, I've replaced applications I'v…

The problem is as usual, users. AI for maintenance (updating & testing deps, re-writing parts to run with next major version of lib) is pretty low error % and just need some supervision and can make it more effective, in hands of people already familiar with project

But the flipside is of course users that are clueless won't now be stopped by "can't make a PR", they will throw prompt at AI and send it when the AI decides it's good enough

Post reply on HN