this is easier to read: https://nonogra.ph/proof-of-care-in-the-age-of-ai-07-14-2026
[deleted]
Proof of care in the age of AI
71–80 of 119 posts
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#72I've sort of been thinking about this in terms of software dev lifecycle & PRs/code review.
Maybe PRs these days need to "test" the human? "Explain how this code works, without AI, or it gets rejected."
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#73Handwriting is inherently ableist. A portion of the population is blessed with the inherent ability of fast, legible handwriting. A portion of the population is not. Typing is an equalizer that allows more people to participate in the conversation.
I hope you're joking. In case you're serious, the same argument could be made about typing, speaking, or really any related activity. Or communication in general.
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#74Handwriting is inherently ableist. A portion of the population is blessed with the inherent ability of fast, legible handwriting. A portion of the population is not. Typing is an equalizer that allows more people to participate in the conversation.
[deleted]
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#75If I had handwritten this, there would be at least one (likely lots more) errors in writing crossed out mingled in with the text. That there isn't makes me wonder why such a lengthy sample contains seemingly zero handwriting errors. Is that plausible? EDIT: After seeing the comments, I am realizing how little I ever rewrote my own writings, an admitted weakness of mine. It was the blindspot behind which I made my rep…
You can handwrite more than just your first draft. It was common before the proliferation of computers to handwrite early drafts in pencil, and then handwrite the final manuscript with ink.
[deleted]
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#76i think the point is good, hadwriting forces you to think more, even from typing the same.. BUT , i am unsure this would be proof you wrote it or AI genereated it , same with tatoos , AI can genereate picutres of said Tatoo...
This isn't about proof that you wrote it - it's about proof that you care. It was important enough that you spent the effort to write it out, or were so dedicated that you committed to wearing it on your body forever. It could be someone else's message, but you are proving it is important to you by showing a personal sacrifice to share the message.
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#77If I had handwritten this, there would be at least one (likely lots more) errors in writing crossed out mingled in with the text. That there isn't makes me wonder why such a lengthy sample contains seemingly zero handwriting errors. Is that plausible? EDIT: After seeing the comments, I am realizing how little I ever rewrote my own writings, an admitted weakness of mine. It was the blindspot behind which I made my rep…
In grammar school in the 90s, I used to write in pencil, then retrace in pen when done, erasing the underlying pencil after the ink dried. I'd proofread the pencil version, find missing words, and you could rewrite to balance out space
I think that was pretty common amongst "keeners" doing writing assignments.
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#78I've been debating switching my blog to a vlog that is a one shot recording, no retakes, just real thoughts and advice in real time.
I've joked with friends its the "Farm to table" for thoughts, at least as much as it can be. Obviously you can just recite a LLM output, but that's more work IMO.
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#79I've been debating switching my blog to a vlog that is a one shot recording, no retakes, just real thoughts and advice in real time. I've joked with friends its the "Farm to table" for thoughts, at least as much as it can be. Obviously you can just recite a LLM output, but that's more work IMO.
There's honestly something to this [0]… you should do it!
Re: Proof of care in the age of AI
#80Guard your mental resources. You always should have, but in the age of AI it is no longer optional. Simple algorithm for not wasting your time: 1) By default nothing is valuable or worth your while 2) Aggressively hunt for signals indicating potential worth (ancient pedigree and/or critical acclaim being most valuable) 3) Choose maybe 10% of what survives for actual reading, scan some others and dump the rest Oh, and…
There is plenty of info here. That you failed to notice it is a separate issue.