31–40 of 119 posts
i think the point is good, hadwriting forces you to think more, even from typing the same.. BUT , i am unsure this would be proof you wrote it or AI genereated it , same with tatoos , AI can genereate picutres of said Tatoo...
While I appreciate the work put into this, I found it pretty hard to read because of the authors handwriting. I would never do this myself because I know that I have awful handwriting, and people would struggle to read it
Am I the only one who thinks the ending is a non-sequitur? How is the hackneyed, "the kids are allright" [sic] related to the preceding content?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
LLM slop is considered low value because it contains a low information/minute as well as a low effort/minute signal. You want to know that the reader put more effort in than you do, and that it is worth your time. The effort signal just points to a possible high information/minute return. When someone takes the laborious effort to provide a short paragraph on an insanely complex topic, precisely written without exces…
> I know they worked hard on it. That is still a valuable sign An infant scrawling the alphabet in its own excrement would have that "signal"...
I would go further and quantify how much of the message is AI in situations where humans edit it.
I love this problem and think it's super important. I've similarly noticed myself using a whiteboard to think critically for a while and then take a picture of the whiteboard as proof of deep thought, even if the next step is AI supplemented (a doc, a video, etc). I've also started noticing people annotating a whole doc "written by humans" to try to convey effort and care. That's fine for some things but do that too…
I love this problem and think it's super important. I've similarly noticed myself using a whiteboard to think critically for a while and then take a picture of the whiteboard as proof of deep thought, even if the next step is AI supplemented (a doc, a video, etc). I've also started noticing people annotating a whole doc "written by humans" to try to convey effort and care. That's fine for some things but do that too…
What do you mean "no way"? We've written long texts for as long as we've been writing as a species.
That is consistent for both pages, but inconsistent with how they seem to be ordered within the text.
I guess the chapters were re-arranged post-script, with the "Storytellers" chapter inserted between them later?