Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

zdnet.com

991–1000 of 1001 posts

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#991

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you see things as negativeism vs positivism? Do you not live in a world where good and evil are syncretic? That mindset is bizarre, to me. My personal experience with Starlink is that it's an expensive LTE alternative. It's not a broadband replacement, the entire thing is pretty clearly a coverup for dual-use technology in low earth orbit: Starshield was adapted from the global communications network Starlink…

I choose positivity, because it allows me to live a happy life. Regarding Starlink, I like it because it gives people free internet in flights. It gives a friend the possibility to stay in a rural home while being able to work. It gives tens of thousands access to information when there are catastrophes like the Venezuela earthquake. It makes people being able to live a happy(er) life.

Satellite internet existed before Starlink. Those people had access to other options, I know that because I was one of them!

Do you still choose positivity when Starlink is used to target and attack civilians and civil infrastructure? Are you still "positive" if Russia or China starts attacking Starlink with satellite weaponry? Are you positive about Starlink when Kessler Syndrome takes over, and leaves customers dependent on a logistics network that was never for them?

There are positives and negatives. As a rural Starlink customer, I feel comfortable saying that the negatives far outweigh the positives.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#992

I have started to see what I think are star link satellites at night on walks with my kids. It actually makes me sad to see that on person owns the night sky and is changing the literal stars my kids will grow up with. It feels different when it’s the government that theoretically represents people but when it’s one person that feels truly depressing.

You can say what you want about Musk (I personally think that he is an appaling human being), but Starlink represents everybody who pays for starlink to get access to the internet, not just Elon.

Yes. But by allowing a monopoly to exist each of those customers has the risk of being forced off the service by a terms of service change, price gouging, or other predictable monopolistic behavior with no alternative. And this is avoidable by ensuring a competitive market or regulated utility.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#993

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Compounding interest means, left unchecked, the natural progression is the “voting” power concentrated until there is only a monarch. A trillion dollars will accumulate $100 billion in passive wealth simply by existing

Compounding interest just skewes the balance so that being voted for earlier is worth more than being voted for later. I'm not saying it's a good system, but it's "aiming" for realtively good things. Just needs a bit of rebalancing regarding what activities help people get voted for. Basically harm shouldn't pay, squatting on limited resources shouldn't pay.

Compounding interest means assets are accumulated and concentrated. At a certain point a tipping point is reached a it’s no longer possible to buy assets. No Russian serf was ever going to have upwards mobility.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#994
post #816
post #811

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It actually makes me sad to see that on person owns the night sky SpaceX has many owners, especially post-IPO. You, too, can buy the sky and sell the sky.

>> SpaceX has many owners, especially post-IPO. You, too, can buy the sky and sell the sky. Perfect, how can this not be a win win for anyone not involved? An opportunity for everyone to become wealthy and scale our riches together. Without Elon, how would so many of us .. “ever have made it”?

https://lunarregistry.com

Given the difference between Musk's optimistic timelines (and share price) and what he actually delivers…

would've been fun, perhaps, to be one of the first Martians. But even though I'm younger than Musk, I no longer expect him to deliver in my lifetime let alone his.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#995
post #373

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Family lives in Rio/Brazil. With the efforts from our government every year that passes, public safety becomes worse and suburban areas get more marginalized, it got to a point where the drug traffickers from my area start cutting the fibers and leaving letters on mailboxes saying that from now on, anyone who wanted internet had to get their illegal internet. Which meant shitty speeds and if you have a problem with b…

So the drug traffickers that cut the fiber have no problem with your Starlink dish outside your home, and don't break it and/or threaten you? If they care, that seems like an oversight they will soon correct once enough people start using it.

antenas are installed at an area not visible to people looking from the street

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#996

I can't wait until this junk starts to collide and blocks us from making any space flights. This has to happen and probability grows with the square of the number of orbiting satellites.

People seem to have a poor understanding of just how much space there is up there. It's just very empty up there. And these things are in precisely controlled orbits that are well documented, etc. Even if you simplify your thinking of orbits to a 2D (square area), it's a lot of space. But that would be a mistake of course. Low earth orbit is three dimensional. Star Link uses several altitude bands of about 20-30km ea…

While you're correct when it comes to calculations, you certainly underestimate the ability for humans to destroy everything around them.

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#997

I have started to see what I think are star link satellites at night on walks with my kids. It actually makes me sad to see that on person owns the night sky and is changing the literal stars my kids will grow up with. It feels different when it’s the government that theoretically represents people but when it’s one person that feels truly depressing.

> It feels different when it’s the government that theoretically represents people but when it’s one person that feels truly depressing. I worked on technology for years that the FCC effectively killed for stupid reasons. So it’s heartening to me that someone can still just do stuff and build things. It’s amazing. If you asked me 10 years ago I would have thought that getting something like Starlink off the ground wo…

[deleted]

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#998

I have started to see what I think are star link satellites at night on walks with my kids. It actually makes me sad to see that on person owns the night sky and is changing the literal stars my kids will grow up with. It feels different when it’s the government that theoretically represents people but when it’s one person that feels truly depressing.

Most people missed my point. I am most concerned about a single person having a monopoly on satellite networks.

Vertical integration of launch capabilities and use of the satellites is an old monopolistic strategy.

Doubling prices over night is kind of an indicator of a monopoly.

https://www.corporatejetinvestor.com/news/starlink-price-ris...

Re: SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth

#999

When Starlink first became available here in poor-ish Central-EU, I was excited. Then, only months later, but after years of planning: EU funding brought fiber to my farm area, at ~$25/900mbps 10ms. While my story is just n=1, I don't understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have However, I am dumb, and very open to be convinced.

> I don't understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India You just said it yourself: > Then, only months later, but after years of planning: Starlink is no replacement for fiber, but even all across the EU and the US there are many places without fiber access.

But, are there enough? Generally, people live in high-density areas :)
Post reply on HN