Live data from Hacker News

Proof of care in the age of AI

jacobfilipp.com

1–10 of 119 posts

Re: Proof of care in the age of AI

#6
Don't handwrite your next post and definitely don't start writing in your own back to front cryptic code.

The reality is people don't always care if a human poured their heart and soul into something. Sometimes they do, but not always.

It's like lamented handwritten script when the printing press was invented....

Re: Proof of care in the age of AI

#8

I was genuinely expecting this to be LLM-generated. Also, what’s his problem with the “Witch Priestess from the North?” EDIT: Oh, the blue backgrounds are links. https://jacobfilipp.com/new-lord/

> I was genuinely expecting this to be LLM-generated.

It isn’t?

Re: Proof of care in the age of AI

#9
That was a fun read! I caught myself almost skimming the first part until i got to the mirrored paragraph, and slowed down significantly after that to read more deliberately.

I'm not sure how much actual advice one can take from this essay though beyond "use personal commitment (e.g. time or presence) to signal importance/care" and "go offline" (aka touch grass)

Re: Proof of care in the age of AI

#10
TLDR proof of care from the article: a low bandwidth process (e.g., from handwriting to tattooing it on your body) that you voluntarily put your words through to convey their level of personal importance.

Some of his examples were tongue in cheek. But even handwriting feels a little too laborious when what we lost that needs replacement is manual typing.

Post reply on HN