Building Food Metadata with LLM Juries
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: Building Food Metadata with LLM Juries
#12Basically it’s AI on top of AI for metadata extraction. There are a lot of claims in the article but not a lot of hard data. In the end they still don’t know if the data is correct. Good luck with your glutes allergy. The weird thing for me is the prompt optimization loop? Why not fine tune the model instead of AI generating the prompt?
Re: Building Food Metadata with LLM Juries
#13Basically it’s AI on top of AI for metadata extraction. There are a lot of claims in the article but not a lot of hard data. In the end they still don’t know if the data is correct. Good luck with your glutes allergy. The weird thing for me is the prompt optimization loop? Why not fine tune the model instead of AI generating the prompt?
Also, "healthy" as a boolean flag is, franky, a bit of a joke.
Re: Building Food Metadata with LLM Juries
#14Basically it’s AI on top of AI for metadata extraction. There are a lot of claims in the article but not a lot of hard data. In the end they still don’t know if the data is correct. Good luck with your glutes allergy. The weird thing for me is the prompt optimization loop? Why not fine tune the model instead of AI generating the prompt?
Also, "healthy" as a boolean flag is, franky, a bit of a joke.