Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
So there is no problem at all. Got it.
The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
261–270 of 464 posts
Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
The way I see it, it's the incessant stimuli you get through these apps. There's just no point where the screen stays quiet, stimulus free. Moving elements capture our attention naturally, especially when the entire screen keeps moving. The endless scroll element just makes sure that the stimulus keeps getting renewed the moment you're done with it. Instead, a scroll should give you a break before heading into the ne…
Hello, what right do you have to regulate the presentation of speech ? If you regulate this format because it’s now considered harmful, what stops El Presidente from moving to ban “zines” because the format is “harmful to young minds” and used by “antifa”? What stops CA from moving to ban forums because threaded formats are suddenly considered “too addicting”? Maybe we should ban VR or first person shooter video game…
Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
Offset / page index is not exactly stable especially for the most common case of newest-first.
“Anchor + Offset” is stable because the anchor param should uniquely identify a specific record from which the offset is applied; a sort-order, direction, and page-size may also be optimally specified.
It's addictive. There is no "one more page and I'm done" because the page never ends and you're never done. You get to the bottom, more content loads automatically and people say "this looks interesting, let me scroll some more". That's why it's doom scrolling because all you do is scroll, no need for any other input. The bait is always there right in front of you and I'll bet that the algorithm make sure the first couple of posts that load every time you get to the bottom are the "juiciest" ones to make sure you take that bait and keep scrolling.
Pagination hides the juicy bait. It's still there waiting for you but it's hidden until you ask for it. That's a big difference.
Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#264For reference, in Norway, you basically have 3 camps:
* Age verification is a detriment to democracy if implemented at a large scale as a requirement to speak in public. Well documented (activists and subject matter experts generally agree on this)
* We will solve the problem of kids online and we will solve it now. The solution must be age verification. Experts loud protest, and even committee findings that warn against are completely ignored (usually people who want a quick and easy solution, politicians who want the bragging rights of having saved the kids)
* We want to solve the problem, but the only obvious solution is age verification so I guess it can't be helped (not really educated on the topic. Just like most of us when it comes to a random political question. Not really a matter of intelligence)
Absolute circus.
I think most people here used the internet as a kid to learn about things and talk to adults in the field there were interested in. For today's kids this happens mostly on the few big sites like twitter and discord.
I'm more than happy to sacrifice endless scroll and recommendation algorithms (at least the type that is thrown at you without consent) to not have to verify my age to speak online.
Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#265Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#266Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#267Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#268Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#269Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#270I've heard a lot of negative talk about Californian politicians, but compared to how the discussion is going on in Norway about the same issue, this is great. It's very refreshing to see politicians actually understand the problem at hand instead of just throwing age checks at it. For reference, in Norway, you basically have 3 camps: * Age verification is a detriment to democracy if implemented at a large scale as a…
https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-should-stand-up-to-bi...