Tacit Knowledge
en.wikipedia.org
Tacit Knowledge
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Tacit Knowledge
#2The idea that a being that if there were a being without access to tacit knowledge, you couldn't really prove that they don't have access because they'd struggle to communicate it in exactly the same way a person with access to their feelings would.
Like "describe the color red" -> it is hot/warm vs it is lucky or romantic or "blue" -> it is cold vs it is suffocating like the ocean vs it is free like the sky.
Re: Tacit Knowledge
#3This is related to the "p-zombie" (philosophical zombie) question, no? The idea that a being that if there were a being without access to tacit knowledge, you couldn't really prove that they don't have access because they'd struggle to communicate it in exactly the same way a person with access to their feelings would. Like "describe the color red" -> it is hot/warm vs it is lucky or romantic or "blue" -> it is cold…
As Von Neumann said: “In mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.”
Re: Tacit Knowledge
#4Re: Tacit Knowledge
#5https://web.archive.org/web/20230926225119/https://www.koopu...
Re: Tacit Knowledge
#6I had not heard the phrase "tacit knowledge" until today; I'm glad to have a word for it.