Live data from Hacker News

Against Usefulness

motivenotes.ai

11–20 of 43 posts

Re: Against Usefulness

#12
While I haven't done a lot with the idea (one month of concentrated work a few years ago, before LLMs), my idea is: the stylus needs to become way more digitized. Keyboards and trackpads are fine, but a computer that understands intent based on how we squiggle, that will help us to get out of our confined way of thinking.

I used to have hacker news web pages that I scribbled upon with a stylus.

Web pages should feel more like paper.

But I'm currently not in a position to work on something like this because I have a pay check to earn. The pay checks that come out of university aren't good enough.

Re: Against Usefulness

#14
That's DynamicLab, which has been around for years. Like most 2D programming environments, it runs into a scaling problem. At some point, the diagram becomes too big. This is why complex logic is designed in VHDL rather than with really big schematics.

There was an era of giant books of schematics. It sucked.

Re: Against Usefulness

#15
A recent discussion here[1] also spiked my interest in "physical computing" I'd love to get on board with people working / brainstorming / exploring new possibilities. I'm very inclined for education, I think the potential is tremendous, but could have plenty other use cases

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747770

Re: Against Usefulness

#16
See something here re mission ops planning.

There’s a tactile element to understanding your assets, supply lines, air/sea/land bridges, time to rendezvous, enemy dispositions, etc that could benefit from a richer visual canvas.

How to take that physical state, encode it so it can be replayed/evolved/disseminated into taskings.

At the moment it’s all spreadsheets, white boards and staff officers.

Thinking cap on - thanks for the post!

Re: Against Usefulness

#19

I do not get the "against usefulness" portion. The article still discusses the projects she deems "useless" in relation to their future potential usefulness.

Deep, paradigm-shifting research often needs decades of deep thought and experimentation, which will not yield weekly, monthly or even annual demonstrations of usefulness to customers or shareholders.

She writes as a VC (I think?) where her job is to allocate capital for shorter-term "useful" (read: profitable) outcomes.

Re: Against Usefulness

#20

I do not get the "against usefulness" portion. The article still discusses the projects she deems "useless" in relation to their future potential usefulness.

Deep, paradigm-shifting research often needs decades of deep thought and experimentation, which will not yield weekly, monthly or even annual demonstrations of usefulness to customers or shareholders. She writes as a VC (I think?) where her job is to allocate capital for shorter-term "useful" (read: profitable) outcomes.

correct, here about my firm - 2nd quarter of being alive and it's just me https://motiveforce.ai/
Post reply on HN