Live data from Hacker News

Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

ca.pcmag.com

31–40 of 204 posts

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried hard but am failing to see how what you say couldn't just be fulfilled by a chat group today (or even back then).

But which one - SMS/RCS? iMessage? WhatsApp? Signal? Telegram? Discord?

E-Mail! :)

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But which one - SMS/RCS? iMessage? WhatsApp? Signal? Telegram? Discord?

Exactly this. Plus the notifications for chat groups are basically: - show me everything - don't notify me at all

Discord is a bit better about that with "pings"

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#33
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't that how it has been?

No, it used to be a shuffled timeline of the posts and likes your connections/friends have made but I guess when half your platform are bots, you don’t want to store that metadata anymore.

Remember the little dot in the end of the feed when you saw all your friends posts?

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried hard but am failing to see how what you say couldn't just be fulfilled by a chat group today (or even back then).

But which one - SMS/RCS? iMessage? WhatsApp? Signal? Telegram? Discord?

When I ran a student society we used an email mailing list.

You can have two if necessary, one only for announcements and one for discussion.

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#35

Back in 2005-ish era, I helped reboot a college club (I was the coach/advisor). We started out using forum software to co-ordinate what we were doing but eventually (2008-ish) switched to Facebook as the president of the club pointed out "Alex, everyone is already on Facebook and the notifications from us are in the middle of the notifications for when the next party is" etc. Fast forward to today and the club is reb…

I think we’re seeing a similar thing pan out with AI. When the barrier for something is too low, people realize that it’s not actually worth the other party’s effort to communicate it to them.

For me, physical communication is quickly becoming a signal that someone actually put effort into things.

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#36

Back in 2005-ish era, I helped reboot a college club (I was the coach/advisor). We started out using forum software to co-ordinate what we were doing but eventually (2008-ish) switched to Facebook as the president of the club pointed out "Alex, everyone is already on Facebook and the notifications from us are in the middle of the notifications for when the next party is" etc. Fast forward to today and the club is reb…

The terminology explains what happened.

The Zuckerberg movie was called The Social Network. At the time we saw the likes of Facebook as networks intended to build 1-1 communications.

Since then, it’s become social Media. It’s now about centralized structures broadcasting messages to subscribers and followers. The only difference from the past is who the broadcasters can be, but it’s no longer about building networks between people.

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried hard but am failing to see how what you say couldn't just be fulfilled by a chat group today (or even back then).

But which one - SMS/RCS? iMessage? WhatsApp? Signal? Telegram? Discord?

Whatever the group owner picks, same as it's always been.

No one cares about the actual choice, only that it is made.

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#38

I noticed last year that FB did some change to their recommendations engine, that they’ll show posts by random people based things you’ve searched. A friend was diagnosed with cancer last year, I searched extensively, and now I’m exclusively getting posts from random people with cancer on my feed.

It’s often very good at finding posts that I might theoretically want to read, except that I never want to read them on Facebook, because it would get in the way of seeing posts from friends.

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#39
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

2015 for me too. I wonder if there was some early day over juicing of the attention mechanism that put people off in that year, before they tuned it to reduce churn…

Tinfoil hat time but I think they definitely did _something_ at that time that "changed" the system. It's the Cambridge Analytica/Trump time and I believe that FB definitely "changed" at the same time.

After Cambridge Analytica, my "intelligent" friends basically abandoned the platform, while my distant conspiracy inclined uncles started posting baseless slop.

Re: Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social Media

#40

Not sure if I see a bad thing in this. I'd like too know what old friends are currently up to and checking their social media has been a way to do so during the golden age of facebook. Lately I feel more value in connecting with them personally, talking and letting them now, that I am still interested in what's going on for them.

That's great if you're cultivating a very small group of friends who are local.

Social media is how I keep vaguely aware of what's going on with my friends who now live scattered across the planet and get to see in person once per decade or so.

Post reply on HN